Google's new image generator is out!

AI Search
14 Aug 202430:02

TLDRGoogle's latest image generator, Imagen 3, is tested against competitors like DALL-E 3 and Flux. The video compares the generators using various prompts, evaluating their ability to follow instructions, generate realistic images, and depict uncommon animals. Imagen 3 impresses with its detail and accuracy, especially in poses and uncommon animals, though it struggles with some complex prompts and anime style. It's free to use and shows significant improvement over its predecessor, positioning itself as a top contender in AI image generation.

Takeaways

  • 🆕 Google has released a new image generator called Imagen 3, which is available on their Test Kitchen site.
  • 🔍 The video compares Imagen 3 with its closest competitors, DALL-E 3 by OpenAI and Flux, which is considered one of the best image generators currently available.
  • 📸 The video includes a series of tests using the same prompts with the three different image models to evaluate the quality and adherence to the prompt.
  • 🏞️ In a test with the prompt 'woman lying on grass', Imagen 3 provided the sharpest details and crispest image compared to Flux and DALL-E 3.
  • 🧘 For the 'woman doing a warrior 1 yoga pose' prompt, Imagen 3 accurately captured the pose and details, impressing the reviewer.
  • 🎤 A prompt for a 'man giving a TED talk' tested the generators' ability to include text and context, with Imagen 3 and Flux performing well, while DALL-E 3 struggled with text accuracy.
  • 📱 Imagen 3 had difficulty generating 'low-quality Snapchat photos' due to content policy violations, but managed to create realistic phone and hand imagery.
  • 🐇 When generating images of animals, Imagen 3 excelled at creating realistic capybaras and komodo dragons, outperforming Flux and DALL-E 3.
  • 📚 Imagen 3 demonstrated strong prompt-following capabilities, accurately depicting scenes involving an owl with spectacles and a library filled with books and magical artifacts.
  • 🌌 The video also tested Imagen 3's ability to create images with specific styles, such as watercolor paintings, and found it capable of generating the desired styles effectively.
  • 🎨 While Imagen 3 showed improvement in generating anime-style images, Flux was still considered superior for this style.
  • 🛍️ For e-commerce product photos, such as wireless headphones, Imagen 3 followed the prompt but the results were not as polished as what could be achieved with other tools like Stable Diffusion.

Q & A

  • What is the name of Google's newest image generator?

    -Google's newest image generator is called Imagen.

  • Where can users find and test Imagen?

    -Users can find and test Imagen on Google's Test Kitchen site, which is linked in the description of the video.

  • How does Imagen compare to its competitors DALL-E 3 by OpenAI and Flux?

    -Imagen is compared with DALL-E 3 and Flux by using the same prompts to generate images and evaluating the quality and adherence to the prompt.

  • What are some of the prompts used to test the image generators?

    -Some of the prompts used include 'a woman lying on grass', 'a woman doing a warrior 1 yoga pose at home', 'a man giving a TED talk with a neon sign saying Ted X AI search', and 'a closeup of a woman's palms and soles of feet with real depth of field'.

  • Which image generator had issues with content policy and failed to generate images for certain prompts?

    -The model on the right, which is implied to be one of the competitors, failed to generate images for certain prompts, violating their content policy.

  • How does Imagen handle generating images of animals, as tested with capybaras and a kodo dragon?

    -Imagen handles generating images of animals well, providing realistic photos of capybaras and an impressively accurate depiction of a kodo dragon.

  • What was the result when testing Imagen with an anime-style prompt?

    -Imagen was able to generate one anime-style image, showing an improvement over the previous generation, although not as strong as Flux, which is known for its anime generation capabilities.

  • How did Imagen perform with an e-commerce product photo prompt?

    -Imagen followed the e-commerce product photo prompt but the generated images of the wireless noise-cancelling headphones were not of the best quality, with some appearing bent or asymmetrical.

  • What is the accessibility of Imagen for users?

    -Imagen is closed source and not downloadable for local offline use, but it is freely available for users to access and use online.

  • What is the conclusion of the video regarding Imagen's performance compared to other image generators?

    -The video concludes that Imagen is a significant improvement over the previous generation and is one of the best image generators available, offering free use and producing images that are as good as or better than some paid services like Mid Journey.

Outlines

00:00

🖼️ Introduction to Google's Imagen and Comparison

The video introduces Google's latest image generator, Imagen, available on their Test Kitchen site. The host plans to demonstrate how it works and compare it with competitors Dolly 3 by OpenAI and Flux. The comparison involves using the same prompts with all three image models to see which produces the best quality and most accurate results. The first prompt is 'a woman lying on grass,' and viewers are asked to judge the quality and adherence to the prompt without knowing which image corresponds to which model. The video also mentions that the order of the models (left, right, center) remains consistent across tests.

05:02

🧘‍♀️ Testing Image Generators with Yoga Poses

The script describes a more challenging test for the image generators, using the prompt 'a woman doing a Warrior 1 yoga pose at home.' The host compares the results from Imagen, Flux, and Dolly 3, noting that Imagen produced the sharpest and most realistic images, while Flux gave a more cinematic feel, and Dolly 3's output was less realistic with oversaturated colors. The host is particularly impressed with Imagen's ability to accurately render human anatomy and the Warrior 1 pose.

10:04

🎤 Testing with TED Talk and Snapchat Prompts

The video script details tests using prompts related to a man giving a TED talk with a specific neon sign and a low-quality Snapchat photo of a teenage man taking a mirror selfie. For the TED talk prompt, Imagen and Flux performed well, with Imagen being very close in quality to Flux, which is known for handling such prompts well. Dolly 3, however, failed to generate the text correctly and produced an image that looked plastic and unrealistic. For the Snapchat prompt, Imagen failed to generate images due to content policy violations, but when the prompt was adjusted, it produced mediocre, low-quality images as requested. Flux and Dolly 3 also generated low-quality images, with Dolly 3 performing particularly well in this style.

15:06

🤲 Close-up of Hands and Feet; Animal Prompts

The script discusses tests involving close-up images of a woman's palms and soles of feet, and the generation of animal images. Imagen excelled in generating realistic hands and feet with depth of field, while Flux had issues with the toes, and Dolly 3 failed due to content policy violations. For animal images, Imagen was successful in generating realistic capybaras and a Komodo dragon, while Flux failed to generate a realistic capybara, and Dolly 3's results were overly cartoonish. The host concludes that Imagen is the best option for generating animal photos.

20:07

📚 Testing with Librarian Owl and Complex Prompts

The video tests Imagen's ability to follow complex prompts, including generating an image of a librarian owl with spectacles perched on a stack of books amidst magical artifacts. Imagen successfully followed the prompt, generating detailed images that included the specified elements. A comparison with Flux and Dolly 3 shows that all three could generate the owl and books, but Dolly 3's style was too bright and oversaturated for the host's preference. The script also describes a prompt involving a red sphere on a blue cube with a green triangle and animals, which Imagen and Flux Dev handled well, while Dolly 3 struggled with context understanding.

25:09

🚀 Testing Imagen's Understanding of Context and Text

The script describes a test of Imagen's ability to understand complex prompts involving context and text, such as an astronaut riding a giant snail with an iridescent shell through a desert landscape while waving a flag saying 'I love Imagen 3.' Imagen successfully generated the image with the correct text on the flag and all elements of the prompt. A comparison with Flux and Dolly 3 shows that Flux got the text right but failed with the snail's appearance, and Dolly 3 couldn't get the text right. The host praises Imagen's significant improvement over the previous generation and concludes that it is one of the best image generators available, especially considering it's free to use.

🎨 Testing Different Styles and E-commerce Prompts

The final paragraph discusses testing Imagen with different art styles, such as watercolor paintings, and e-commerce product photos. Imagen was able to generate watercolor-style images of a whale in the sky, although Dolly 3 was too detailed and Flux struggled with non-human subjects. For the e-commerce prompt of wireless headphones on a reflective surface, none of the generators produced perfect results, but Imagen and Flux were closer to what was requested compared to Dolly 3. The host summarizes the review, noting Imagen's improvements and its free availability, and encourages viewers to share their experiences with the tool.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Image generator

An image generator is a software tool or AI model that creates images based on textual descriptions or prompts. In the context of the video, Google's new image generator, Imagen, is being introduced and compared with other generators like Dolly 3 and Flux. The video discusses how these generators interpret prompts and generate corresponding images, which is central to the theme of exploring AI-generated imagery.

💡Imagen

Imagen is Google's newest image generator, version 3, which is the focus of the video. The script mentions testing Imagen's capabilities against its competitors and showcases its performance in generating images from various prompts. It is highlighted for its ability to produce high-quality and detailed images, setting a benchmark against which other generators are compared.

💡Dolly 3

Dolly 3 is an image generator developed by OpenAI, which is mentioned as one of the closest competitors to Google's Imagen. The video compares Dolly 3 with Imagen and Flux in terms of image quality and adherence to prompts. It is often critiqued for producing images that are too bright, plastic-looking, and sometimes failing to meet the content policy.

💡Flux

Flux is described as arguably the best image generator currently available. The video includes Flux in the comparison tests against Imagen and Dolly 3 to evaluate which generator produces the most accurate and high-quality images in response to given prompts. Flux is noted for its cinematic feel and ability to generate certain types of images exceptionally well.

💡Prompt

A prompt in the context of image generators is a textual description or command that guides the AI in creating a specific image. The video script contains multiple examples of prompts used to test the capabilities of the image generators, such as 'a woman lying on grass' or 'a man giving a TED talk.' The effectiveness of an image generator is often measured by its ability to accurately interpret and respond to these prompts.

💡Content policy

Content policy refers to the guidelines that image generators use to filter out inappropriate or sensitive content. The script mentions instances where certain images generated by the models were censored due to violating content policies, particularly in cases where the prompts might have led to the creation of NSFW (Not Safe For Work) content.

💡Realism

Realism in the context of image generation refers to the ability of an AI model to create images that closely resemble real-world objects and scenes. The video discusses the realism of the images produced by Imagen, Dolly 3, and Flux, with a focus on how accurately they depict human anatomy, animal features, and other details in响应 to various prompts.

💡Censorship

Censorship in the video refers to the automatic filtering out of images generated by AI models that are deemed inappropriate or violate content policies. The script mentions that some of the generated images were censored, indicating that the image generators have mechanisms in place to prevent the creation of certain types of content.

💡Anime

Anime is a style of animation that originated in Japan and is characterized by colorful artwork, fantastical themes, and vibrant characters. The video includes a test of the image generators' ability to produce anime-style images, with a prompt for an 'anime girl in the city at night.' This tests the generators' capacity to understand and replicate specific artistic styles.

💡E-commerce photo

An e-commerce photo refers to images used for online retail, typically showcasing products in an appealing and professional manner. The video tests the image generators' ability to create an e-commerce photo of 'a pair of wireless noise-cancelling headphones in matte black on a sleek reflective surface with a gradient background,' assessing their utility for commercial applications.

Highlights

Google has released a new image generator called Imagen 3.

Imagen 3 is available on Google's Test Kitchen site.

The video compares Imagen 3 with Dolly 3 by OpenAI and Flux, the current best image generator.

Imagen 3, Dolly 3, and Flux were tested with the same prompt to evaluate their performance.

Imagen 3 produced the sharpest details and crispest images among the three generators.

Imagen 3 excelled at generating accurate hands, fingers, and feet, which previous models struggled with.

Imagen 3 was able to generate a realistic Warrior One yoga pose, showcasing its understanding of human anatomy.

Dolly 3 struggled with generating realistic faces and detailed textures.

Imagen 3 was successful in generating a photo of a man giving a TED talk with a neon sign, despite the complexity of the prompt.

Imagen 3 failed to generate low-quality, mediocre photos that Flux excels at, likely due to content policy violations.

Imagen 3 demonstrated a strong ability to generate realistic photos of animals, outperforming Flux and Dolly 3.

Imagen 3 was able to generate a realistic Komodo dragon, a task that other generators could not accomplish.

Imagen 3 showed an understanding of complex prompts, including positioning and context.

Imagen 3 was able to generate text on images, such as a flag saying 'I love Imagen 3', which was a part of the prompt.

Imagen 3 improved significantly over its predecessor, Imagen 2, in generating anime-style images.

For e-commerce product photos, Imagen 3 did not perform as well as expected, suggesting the use of other tools like Stable Diffusion for such tasks.

Imagen 3 is a free tool offered by Google, making it an attractive alternative to paid image generation services.