It's Time to Discuss the Elephant in the Room...

Growing Up In Scientology
4 May 2024131:09

TLDRIn a recent video, the host addresses the ongoing conflict within the former Scientology community, specifically the infighting driven by the Aftermath Foundation board members. He discusses the negative impact of this drama on the community's efforts to expose the abuses of Scientology. The host also shares personal details about his separated status with his wife since November 2019, and the false rumors spread by some board members and their associates. He further reveals a coordinated campaign to discredit him, including a fake Twitter account pretending to be Anonymous threatening him and his foundation. The video is a call for unity and a cessation of the internal conflicts that detract from the movement's goals.


  • ๐Ÿ“ข The speaker addresses the 'elephant in the room,' referring to ongoing drama and infighting within the former Scientology community, particularly involving the Aftermath Foundation and its board members.
  • ๐Ÿšซ The speaker expresses frustration with the lack of action from the Aftermath Foundation board and paid agents to stop the infighting and attacks on former Scientologists.
  • ๐Ÿค” Questions are raised about why the Aftermath Foundation, which claims to be ethical, continues to engage in behavior that seems contrary to its code of conduct.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฌ The speaker discusses their personal situation, including their separation from their wife and the public fallout from their private life being exposed.
  • ๐Ÿ˜ก There is a detailed account of how a woman the speaker had a relationship with has been creating content attacking him, allegedly with the encouragement of Leah Remini and others.
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ The speaker suggests that the conflict within the community is being fueled by a few key individuals, including Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, and calls for an end to the hypocrisy and attacks.
  • ๐Ÿค An appeal is made for unity and a focus on the common goal of exposing the abuses of Scientology, rather than fighting amongst themselves.
  • ๐Ÿ“‰ The speaker acknowledges the potential negative impact of this infighting on their YouTube channel and the broader movement against Scientology.
  • ๐Ÿ’” The speaker expresses disappointment and betrayal by those who were once allies but are now contributing to the conflict and attacking him and others.
  • ๐Ÿšจ A warning is given about the potential legal actions that may be taken against those spreading false information and slandering the speaker.
  • ๐ŸŒŸ The speaker emphasizes their commitment to continuing their work and supporting the community, despite the personal and public challenges they are facing.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue being discussed in the transcript?

    -The main issue discussed is the infighting and drama within the former Scientology community, particularly involving the Aftermath Foundation and its board members.

  • Why does the speaker believe the drama within the community is harmful?

    -The speaker believes it is harmful because it distracts from the primary goal of exposing the abuses of Scientology and is bad for building a successful YouTube channel focused on that purpose.

  • What does the speaker accuse the Aftermath Foundation board members of doing?

    -The speaker accuses the Aftermath Foundation board members of attacking former Scientologists, spreading rumors about him, and engaging in behavior that contradicts the foundation's code of conduct.

  • What personal information does the speaker reveal about his own life?

    -The speaker reveals that he and his wife separated but continued living together, and he has been seeing another person on and off for the last four years.

  • Why does the speaker feel betrayed by Leah Remini and Mike Rinder?

    -The speaker feels betrayed because Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, who he believes are leading the Aftermath Foundation, have not stopped the board members from attacking him and others, and because they have been in touch with a person who is making slanderous videos about him.

  • What is the 'elephant in the room' the speaker refers to?

    -The 'elephant in the room' refers to the ongoing conflict and drama within the former Scientology community, which the speaker believes is being fueled by Leah Remini and Mike Rinder.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the criticism of Mike Rinder?

    -The speaker believes that Mike Rinder deserves criticism for his past actions within Scientology and that he should be able to withstand questioning and scrutiny.

  • Why does the speaker think the situation has escalated?

    -The speaker thinks the situation has escalated because of the involvement of Leah Remini and Mike Rinder, who he claims are not only not stopping the attacks but are also encouraging them.

  • What does the speaker want to happen moving forward?

    -The speaker wants a cessation of hostilities and a focus on the common goal of exposing Scientology, rather than fighting amongst themselves.

  • How does the speaker feel about his own role in the community?

    -The speaker acknowledges his role and the platform he has, but he also states that he does not consider himself a leader and that everyone should be able to be held accountable for their actions.

  • What action is the speaker taking regarding the slanderous videos?

    -The speaker is pursuing legal action against the person making the slanderous videos, as he believes they are making false claims about his marital status.



๐Ÿ˜€ Addressing the Elephant in the Room

The speaker begins by addressing the audience on the SPTv channel, acknowledging the recent drama and infighting within the community, particularly concerning former Scientologists. They express their intention to discuss the issues rationally and calmly, mentioning their role in attempting to mediate the situation and the lack of authority they hold over others' actions.


๐Ÿ˜  The Ongoing Drama and Questions Raised

The speaker delves into the ongoing drama within the community, questioning why the infighting has not ceased despite the existence of a code of ethical conduct. They highlight the lack of intervention by perceived leaders and the public attacks on former Scientologists, suggesting a need to understand the motivations behind these actions.


๐Ÿ’” Personal Relationships and Public Backlash

The speaker discusses their personal life, including the separation from their wife and subsequent relationships. They mention the public backlash they faced when their private life was exposed, including attempts to humiliate and discredit them. The speaker also addresses the recent actions of an ex-partner who has been creating content criticizing them.


๐Ÿค” The Connection Between Personal and Community Issues

The speaker attempts to connect their personal situation with the broader community issues, expressing surprise and dismay at the involvement of Aftermath Foundation board members in supporting the ex-partner's negative campaign. They highlight the hypocrisy of these individuals, questioning why they would encourage such behavior.


๐Ÿ˜ก The Spread of False Rumors and Their Impact

The speaker shares an email from Matt Pesch, an Aftermath Foundation board member, which alludes to false rumors about the speaker's personal life. They express disbelief at the absurdity of the situation and question the tactics being used by the board members, likening them to Scientology's 'fair game' policy.


๐Ÿง The Role of Authority Figures in the Conflict

The speaker scrutinizes the role of authority figures like Mike Rinder and Leah Remini in the ongoing conflict, suggesting that their influence may be a significant factor in the perpetuation of the drama. They discuss the power dynamics within the community and the need to hold these figures accountable for their actions.


๐Ÿ“ข Public Support and the Need for Transparency

The speaker addresses the public support they have received and emphasizes the importance of transparency in their communication. They express gratitude towards their audience and supporters, reiterating their commitment to addressing the issues at hand and moving forward constructively.


๐Ÿค The Desire for Reconciliation and Constructive Action

The speaker concludes by expressing a desire for reconciliation and a shift in focus towards more constructive actions. They encourage the community to unite in exposing the abuses of Scientology rather than engaging in infighting, and they offer support for any solution that promotes unity and progress.




Scientology is a set of religious beliefs and practices that was developed in the early 1950s by L. Ron Hubbard. In the video, the speaker discusses the negative aspects and abuses of the organization, which is a central theme of the content. The speaker is involved in exposing what they perceive as the harmful practices of Scientology.


Infighting refers to conflict or rivalry within a group. The speaker mentions infighting within the community of former Scientologists, which is a significant issue being addressed in the video. It is depicted as a distraction from the common goal of exposing the alleged abuses of Scientology.

๐Ÿ’กAftermath Foundation

The Aftermath Foundation is an organization that is mentioned in the video as being involved in the ongoing drama and conflict within the community of individuals critical of Scientology. The speaker discusses the role of the foundation and its board members in the ongoing disputes.

๐Ÿ’กPrivate Life

The speaker's private life becomes a topic of discussion as they address rumors and attacks against them. The video touches on the invasion of privacy and the use of personal information to discredit or harm individuals, which is a tactic the speaker condemns.

๐Ÿ’กFair Game

Fair game is a term used within Scientology that refers to the idea that anyone critical of the organization can be targeted for retaliation without limit. The speaker accuses others of using this concept against fellow former Scientologists, which they find hypocritical, especially when some are legally fighting against Scientology's alleged use of fair game.

๐Ÿ’กOpen Marriage

An open marriage is a type of marital relationship where the partners have agreed to be non-monogamous. The speaker discusses their own open marriage arrangement and how it has been misrepresented by others to attack their character, which is a key personal issue being addressed.


Slander is the act of making a false spoken statement that harms the reputation of another person. The speaker indicates they will pursue legal action for slander due to false claims made about their marital status, showing the severity of the accusations and their impact.

๐Ÿ’กSTI (Sexually Transmitted Infection)

The acronym STI is mentioned in the context of a rumor being spread about the speaker, which they vehemently deny. It's used as an example of the personal and damaging rumors that are part of the infighting and character assassination within the community discussed in the video.


Anonymous, in this context, refers to a loosely associated international group of activist and hacktivist entities. A fake Twitter account pretending to be Anonymous is mentioned in the video, where the speaker discusses the threat it posed and the reaction of the Aftermath Foundation board members to it.

๐Ÿ’กCode of Conduct

A code of conduct is a set of rules or principles that outline acceptable behavior. The speaker questions the behavior of the Aftermath Foundation board members, suggesting that their actions against other former Scientologists are in violation of the foundation's own code of conduct.

๐Ÿ’กYouTube Channel

A YouTube channel is a platform for uploading and sharing videos. The speaker discusses their own YouTube channel and the growth of their platform, which is a significant part of their activism against Scientology and a target of the infighting mentioned in the video.


The host addresses the ongoing drama and infighting within the former Scientology community, particularly focusing on the actions of the Aftermath Foundation board members.

Despite not being a leader, the host has tried to mediate and reduce tensions within the community, especially after the creation of the new SPTv Foundation.

The host expresses concern over the continuous attacks on former Scientologists by the Aftermath Foundation, questioning why there is no intervention from its board members.

The host discusses his personal life, including his separated status from his wife and the controversy that has arisen from it within the community.

The host reveals that his wife was contacted by individuals trying to use personal information against him, leading to a public disclosure of their relationship status.

Leah Remini and Mike Rinder's lack of response to the ongoing issues within the community is highlighted as a point of contention.

The host calls out specific individuals, including board members of the Aftermath Foundation, for their role in spreading rumors and engaging in unethical behavior.

A detailed account of the host's relationship with a woman who has been creating content critical of him is provided, including her connections to Aftermath Foundation members.

The host expresses his disappointment in Leah Remini for not taking action to stop the infighting and for her alleged role in encouraging attacks against him.

Evidence is presented to show that Aftermath Foundation board members have been engaging in behavior that contradicts the foundation's code of conduct.

The host discusses the hypocrisy of Leah Remini's public stance against Scientology's 'fair game' policy while allegedly engaging in similar tactics against fellow former Scientologists.

The host addresses the issue of the OSA (Office of Special Affairs) files and the controversy surrounding their distribution and use within the anti-Scientology movement.

A call to action is made for the community to focus on its original mission of exposing Scientology rather than engaging in internal conflicts.

The host offers a perspective on the importance of being able to criticize leaders within the movement without fear of retaliation or being ostracized.

The host concludes by expressing his willingness to foster peace within the community, provided that the right to critique Scientology and its former leaders is preserved.