Testing good-gpt-2 and also-good-gpt2 in chatbot arena
TLDRThe video transcript details a chatbot arena experiment where two AI models, GPT-2 and Gemini 1.5 Pro, are tested on their ability to generate code for various tasks. The tasks include creating an animated light bulb for toggling light and dark modes, generating a range of mini circles rotating around a larger circle with color changes influenced by mouse movements, and designing a sample website with images from splash dot com featuring a transparent glass effect. The experiment showcases the AI's coding capabilities, with GPT-2 producing more complex and detailed code. The video also highlights the benefits of becoming a patron for access to code files, courses, and one-on-one interaction with the presenter.
Takeaways
- ๐ก The chatbot was tasked with creating an interactive light bulb animation on an HTML page that could toggle light and dark mode.
- ๐ The user requested a more detailed code for the animation, including a cord that could be pulled to simulate an old-fashioned lamp.
- ๐ Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT-2 were compared in their ability to generate the required animations and code.
- ๐ GPT-2 produced more code and offered a more visually appealing light bulb animation, though the cord pulling interaction was not fully realized.
- ๐ฅ๏ธ The user asked for an enhancement to control the light bulb with mouse click and drag events in multiple directions.
- ๐จ A new prompt was given to create mini circles rotating around a larger circle, with color changes and speed affected by mouse proximity to the center.
- ๐ The chatbot was also asked to create a sample website with images from splashbase.com, with a transparent and glass effect design.
- ๐ The final website created by GPT-2 was more complex and visually appealing than the initial version, showing the chatbot's ability to improve upon feedback.
- ๐ The chatbot struggled with a fractal zoom animation, indicating that some tasks may be too complex or require a different approach or tool.
- ๐ The streamer highlighted the benefits of becoming a patron, including access to code files, courses, and one-on-one interaction.
- ๐ค The chatbot's refusal to deny any task, regardless of complexity, was praised, showing its versatility and potential for handling a wide range of requests.
- ๐ The potential of GPT-2 as a smaller, yet highly capable model was discussed, hinting at exciting developments for the future of AI.
Q & A
What is the primary task the user asked the chatbot to perform?
-The primary task the user asked the chatbot to perform was to create an animation of a light bulb on the top right of an HTML page with a toggle for light and dark mode, and a cord underneath that could be 'pulled'.
Which model was first to be copied by the user?
-The first model copied by the user was Gemini 1.5 Pro.
What was the issue with the initial animation created by the chatbot?
-The issue with the initial animation was that the user couldn't interact with the cord to 'pull' it, as they had requested.
How did the user attempt to improve the animation?
-The user attempted to improve the animation by sending a new prompt asking for a cord pulling animation that stretches and bounces back, similar to an old-fashioned lamp.
What was the user's request regarding the control of the light bulb animation?
-The user requested that the light bulb animation be controlled by a mouse click and drag event, with the ability to work in multiple directions.
What was the user's second task for the chatbot?
-The user's second task was to create lots of mini circles around a larger circle that rotate and randomly change color, with the speed and color change affected by mouse movements.
How did the user describe the benefits of becoming a patron?
-The user described the benefits of becoming a patron as having access to all the code files for inspiration, access to all courses including a master class on coding efficiently, and the opportunity to connect with the user one-on-one.
What was the issue with the initial code provided by Gemini for the second task?
-The issue with the initial code provided by Gemini was that nothing was happening as expected; it did not produce the desired animation effect.
What was the user's feedback on the GPT 2's code for the second task?
-The user found GPT 2's code to be longer and more complex, but it did not exactly meet the request for dynamic interaction based on mouse movements.
What was the user's final task for creating a website?
-The user's final task was to create a sample website with images from splashbase.com, with everything on the webpage having a transparent and glass effect, making the webpage as beautiful as possible.
How did the user rate the performance of the chatbot models?
-The user was impressed with the performance of the chatbot models, especially considering the complexity of the tasks and the capabilities of the models, noting that they were very capable for possibly being smaller or open-source models.
Outlines
๐ก Creating an Interactive Light Bulb Animation
The speaker discusses their experience at the chatbot arena, where they interacted with a chatbot to create an animated light bulb on an HTML page. The goal was to create a toggle for light and dark mode with a cord that could be pulled. They compared the performance of two models, Gemini 1.5 Pro and GPT2, and found that GPT2 produced more code but resulted in a more realistic light bulb animation. The speaker then refined the prompt to include a cord pulling animation, which GPT2 successfully implemented with an impressive interactive feature. They also experimented with creating mini circles rotating around a larger circle, influenced by mouse movements, aiming to create a visually dynamic and interactive web experience.
๐ Designing a Dynamic Web Page with CSS and JavaScript
The speaker moves on to discuss creating a web page with a dynamic visual effect using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. They ask the chatbot to arrange 20 small circles around a larger circle that rotate and change color slowly against a dark background. The chatbot named Opus provided a simpler solution with less code, while GPT2's response was more complex and closer to the desired effect but still required refinement. The speaker then requested the speed of spinning and color change to be influenced by mouse movements on the page. They also tasked the chatbot with creating a sample website using images from the splash website with a transparent and glass effect, aiming for a beautiful and intricate design. The speaker concludes by expressing satisfaction with the chatbot's capabilities and the potential of such models for web development.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กChatbot
๐กHTML Page
๐กLight and Dark Mode
๐กCode
๐กAnimation
๐กWeb Development
๐กMouse Click Drag Event
๐กCSS
๐กJavaScript
๐กFractal
๐กPatron
Highlights
Testing chatbot capabilities in creating animations and interactive elements in HTML.
A request to create an animation of a light bulb for toggling light and dark mode.
Innovative use of code to simulate an old-fashioned light bulb with a pull cord.
Comparison between two models, Gemini 1.5 Pro and also-good-gpt2, in terms of code efficiency and output.
Gemini 1.5 Pro's code allows for a working light bulb animation but lacks interactivity.
Also-good-gpt2's code generates a more visually appealing light bulb with some interactivity.
The addition of a cord pulling animation to the light bulb simulation.
GPT-2's code evolves to include a mouse click drag event for the light bulb's cord.
A creative challenge to create mini circles rotating around a larger circle, changing colors based on mouse proximity.
The benefits of becoming a patron, including access to code files and courses on efficient coding.
An attempt to create a more complex animation with dynamic elements based on user input.
The importance of breaking down complex tasks into simpler steps for better AI comprehension and execution.
A simple prompt to create an HTML, CSS, and JS animation with 20 small circles around a larger one.
Opus' and GPT-2's differing approaches to creating the animation with circles.
Adjusting the animation to react to mouse movements, changing the speed and color of the circles.
A request to create a sample website with images from splash dot com, featuring a transparent and glass effect.
GPT-2's creation of a beautiful, albeit complex, website layout with a glass effect.
A challenge to create an infinite, normal, broad fractal zoom on an HTML canvas, aiming for a colorful and elegant outcome.
The limitations of rendering complex fractal animations in a browser environment.
Impressive capabilities of smaller models like GPT-2, showcasing the potential of AI in coding and web development.