This Print on Demand AI Art Generator Destroys Everyone!
TLDRIn this video, the host compares two AI art generators, Adobe Firefly and Mid-Journey, to determine which one better handles various prompts and delivers higher quality results. Adobe Firefly is currently free and user-friendly, integrated into Adobe's website, while Mid-Journey requires a Discord connection and costs $10 per month. The host emphasizes the importance of not simply slapping AI art onto products but using it as a source of inspiration or to generate elements for a larger design. After inputting the same prompt into both generators, the results show that Adobe Firefly produces more photorealistic images, which may not be ideal for print-on-demand or graphic design purposes. In contrast, Mid-Journey's output is more aligned with the desired cute, cartoony, Kawaii style suitable for merchandise. The host concludes that Mid-Journey has the edge for this specific application, although Adobe Firefly offers other valuable features like text effects and generative tools. The video encourages viewers to explore both tools and decide which best fits their needs.
Takeaways
- ๐ Adobe Firefly is currently free, but its pricing may change when integrated into Adobe tools.
- ๐ฒ Mid-journey is not free, with the basic plan costing ten dollars per month.
- ๐ Adobe Firefly is easier to use as it's hosted on Adobe's website, while Mid-journey requires Discord for a more complex process.
- ๐จ It's advised not to directly use AI art on merchandise without further creative input.
- ๐ AI art generators are better utilized to create characters or elements for larger designs, which can then be manipulated or redrawn for inspiration.
- ๐ The prompt used for testing was intentionally a bit crazy to push the AI's capabilities.
- ๐ dsnr.ai was used to enhance the basic prompts for better understanding by the AI art generators.
- ๐ฑ Adobe Firefly's results were generally realistic, with some oddities like the cat's position or the spoon's orientation.
- ๐ Mid-journey's results were more aligned with the desired kawaii style, despite some images having the cat in the bowl.
- ๐ Mid-journey is considered to have performed better for graphic print-on-demand style and understanding the prompt.
- ๐ง Both AI art generators have their strengths, and the user plans to continue using both for different purposes.
- ๐ Adobe Firefly's full potential is in its text capabilities, which will be explored in a subsequent video.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video script?
-The main topic of the video script is a comparison between Adobe Firefly and mid-journey, two AI art generators, to determine which one is better at handling different prompts and delivering high-quality results.
How does the speaker describe the current status of Adobe Firefly in terms of cost?
-Adobe Firefly is currently free, but the speaker mentions that this might change when it gets integrated into Adobe tools like Photoshop and Premiere Pro.
What is the primary difference the speaker notes between Adobe Firefly and mid-journey in terms of user interface?
-Adobe Firefly is described as being more user-friendly as it is hosted on Adobe's website, whereas mid-journey requires the use of Discord, which the speaker finds to make the process slightly more complicated.
What is the speaker's opinion on using AI art for print-on-demand products?
-The speaker advises against simply slapping AI art onto products like t-shirts or mugs, stating that it looks terrible, is uncreative, and won't sell well. Instead, the speaker suggests using AI art generators for generating characters or elements of a design that can be further manipulated or used for inspiration.
What tool does the speaker use to help create highly visual prompts for the AI art generators?
-The speaker uses dsnr.ai, another AI tool, to transform basic prompts into ones that both mid-journey and Adobe Firefly can understand and use to create high-quality graphics.
What is the speaker's evaluation of Adobe Firefly's results after testing it with a specific prompt?
-The speaker is generally pleased with Adobe Firefly's results, although they note some oddities like a spoon being the wrong way around and a cat's neck appearing broken. The speaker's favorite result from Adobe Firefly has a well-rendered bowl and a cute cat, except for the misplaced spoon.
How does the speaker compare the realism of Adobe Firefly's AI art with the style the speaker is aiming for?
-The speaker finds that Adobe Firefly tends to produce more photorealistic results, which does not align with the desired cute, cartoony, Kawaii style suitable for graphic design and print-on-demand products.
Which AI art generator does the speaker prefer for creating graphics for print-on-demand?
-The speaker prefers mid-journey for creating graphics for print-on-demand due to its better adherence to the desired Kawaii style and clearer understanding of the prompt.
What is the speaker's strategy for improving the results from the AI art generators?
-The speaker suggests tweaking the prompt to be more clear about the desired style and elements, such as ensuring the cat is not depicted inside the bowl.
What other features of Adobe Firefly does the speaker mention and appreciate?
-The speaker appreciates Adobe Firefly's text effects feature, which allows for the creation of unique and cool effects using letters and text, something that not many other AI tools can do well.
What does the speaker recommend for viewers interested in the full capabilities of Adobe Firefly?
-The speaker recommends checking out another video where they go into detail about Adobe Firefly's AI text generator and explain why it can be a game changer for businesses.
How does the speaker summarize their stance on both AI art generators?
-The speaker concludes that both Adobe Firefly and mid-journey are very good and have their strengths. However, for creating graphics for print-on-demand, mid-journey is considered superior, while Adobe Firefly is still valuable for its other features.
Outlines
๐จ Comparing Adobe Firefly and Mid-Journey for AI Art Generation
This paragraph introduces a comparison between Adobe Firefly and Mid-Journey, two AI art generators, to determine which one better handles various prompts and delivers higher quality results. Adobe Firefly is currently free and integrates seamlessly within Adobe's ecosystem, while Mid-Journey requires a monthly fee and uses Discord for its interface. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not directly using AI-generated art on merchandise without further creative input. Instead, they suggest using AI to generate characters or elements to inspire intricate designs. The test involves inputting the same prompt into both generators to compare their outputs. Adobe Firefly's results are generally realistic, with some oddities in the depiction of objects, while the speaker expresses satisfaction with some of the generated images despite minor imperfections.
๐ Mid-Journey Outperforms in Graphic Design and Print-on-Demand
The second paragraph discusses the results from the AI art generation test, highlighting that Mid-Journey has outperformed Adobe Firefly in terms of creating graphics suitable for print-on-demand and graphic design. The speaker points out that while Adobe Firefly aims for photorealism, which isn't ideal for the intended use cases, Mid-Journey's output is more aligned with the desired cute, cartoony, and Kawaii style. The speaker's favorite image from Mid-Journey is chosen for its adherence to the prompt and overall appeal, despite some positioning issues with the cat in the bowl. The paragraph concludes with the speaker's intention to continue using both tools, acknowledging the strengths of each, and a teaser for a future video that will delve into Adobe Firefly's text generation capabilities.
Mindmap
Keywords
๐กAdobe Firefly
๐กmid-journey
๐กPrint on Demand
๐กAI Art
๐กdsnr.ai
๐กPhotorealistic
๐กKawaii
๐กDiscord
๐กText Effects
๐กGenerative Fill
๐ก3D to Image
Highlights
Adobe Firefly and mid-journey are compared to determine the better AI art generator.
Adobe Firefly is currently free but may change when integrated into Adobe tools.
Mid-journey is no longer free, with a basic plan costing $10 per month.
Adobe Firefly is easier to use, being in-house on Adobe's website.
Mid-journey requires using Discord, making the process more complicated.
The test involves using the same prompt in both AI art generators to compare results.
AI art should not be directly used on merchandise without proper creative integration.
AI art generators are better used for generating characters or elements for larger designs.
dsnr.ai is used to create highly visual prompts for the AI art generators.
Adobe Firefly's results are generally more photorealistic.
Mid-journey's results are more cartoony and Kawaii, suitable for graphic prints.
The reviewer prefers mid-journey for graphic print on demand style.
Adobe Firefly has additional features like text effects, generative fill, and generative recolor.
Despite preferences, both AI art generators have their strengths.
The reviewer will continue to use both tools for different purposes.
The true power of Adobe Firefly lies in its text capabilities.
A follow-up video will detail Adobe Firefly's AI text generator and its potential impact on business.