Redrawing More AI Art Because You Guys Liked the First One

A Cup of Chamomile
6 May 202418:33

TLDRThe artist revisits AI-generated artwork, this time redrawing three more pieces with a critical eye towards the inconsistencies and logical flaws inherent in AI art. They share their process of refining the designs, addressing issues such as hand placement and outfit inconsistencies, and experiment with their art style. The video also touches on the broader implications of AI in the art industry, discussing its potential as a tool for inspiration and menial task assistance, while strongly advocating for the irreplaceable value of human creativity and effort in art. The artist concludes by inviting viewers to engage with their content and support their work.


  • 🎨 The artist is redrawing AI-generated artwork and sharing their thoughts on AI art, which received a positive response from the audience.
  • ✍️ The artist plans to make a series out of redrawing AI art, aiming to help people identify the inconsistencies that make AI art distinguishable.
  • 🧐 The artist will not simply copy the original AI pieces but will make changes to character designs to address logic problems and enhance refinement.
  • 🚫 The artist clarifies they are not trying to steal anyone’s characters inspired by AI pieces and that their redraws are for fun and potential future original characters.
  • 👀 The artist points out common AI art flaws such as inconsistent hands, hairstyles, and accessories, using these as teaching moments.
  • 💭 The artist discusses their process of redrawing, including changing poses, refining character designs, and experimenting with different styles.
  • 📈 The success of the first video on AI art has motivated the artist to continue the series and spite the AI art supporters.
  • 🎭 The artist talks about the potential uses of AI in art, such as assisting with complex calculations or menial tasks, but emphasizes that human effort is crucial for quality in art.
  • 🌟 The artist shares their views on AI's role in the art industry, stating that AI should not replace human creativity and effort, but can be a tool for inspiration and efficiency.
  • 🖌️ The artist describes their approach to coloring and shading, experimenting with new techniques and styles to evolve their artwork.
  • ✂️ The artist concludes by encouraging viewers to support their work, engage with their content, and maintain a civil discussion about AI art.

Q & A

  • What was the reception to the artist's first video on AI-generated art?

    -The first video on AI-generated art received an absolutely insane reception and became a Hit Tweet, motivating the artist to continue the series.

  • How does the artist approach redrawing AI-generated artwork?

    -The artist does not make a total copy of the original pieces. They change poses and aspects of a character's design if there are logic problems or if the original design could use refinement.

  • What are some telltale signs that make AI art distinguishable?

    -Inconsistencies in the artwork, such as the character's hairstyle, outfit, and accessories, as well as issues like floating objects or illogical poses, are some telltale signs of AI art.

  • How does the artist feel about AI's role in the art industry?

    -The artist believes AI can be a useful tool for running complex calculations or assisting with menial tasks, but it should not replace human effort, which is essential for the quality and soul of an artwork.

  • What was the artist's most successful video to date?

    -The video on AI-generated art has been the artist's most successful video to date, with a warm overall reception despite some negative comments.

  • How does the artist view the use of AI in other creative fields like animation?

    -The artist acknowledges that AI can be used in creative fields like animation for tasks that would otherwise take hours, but emphasizes that AI is an imitator, not an innovator, and should not replace human creativity.

  • What changes did the artist make to the character designs in the redraws?

    -The artist changed accessories, poses, and certain design elements of the characters to address logic problems or to refine the original design. They also experimented with their art style and shading techniques.

  • What is the artist's stance on using AI-generated images as inspiration?

    -The artist is against using AI-generated images and claiming them as one's own work, considering it lazy and unethical. However, they see using AI as inspiration as acceptable, as long as the final artwork is significantly altered and original.

  • How does the artist feel about the comments from people who support AI art?

    -The artist is critical of those who support AI art without understanding its implications on the art industry. They view such support as either hypocritical, trolling, or indicative of laziness.

  • What was the artist's approach to the background in the redraws?

    -The artist chose to use simplistic backgrounds for the redraws to not distract from the character designs. They experimented with different base colors to ensure the characters would stand out.

  • What was the artist's opinion on the use of AI in the remake of Final Fantasy VII?

    -The artist mentioned that AI was used for facial expressions, lip syncing, and camera positioning in the remake, but noted that Square Enix still built each location with new and unique assets, indicating that human effort was still a significant part of the game's development.

  • How did the artist's views on AI evolve after their first video on the subject?

    -The artist's views remained consistent, reiterating the importance of human effort in art and the limitations of AI as a tool. They continued to criticize the misuse of AI in art theft and encouraged artists to create original work.



🎨 Redrawing AI Artwork and Addressing Reception

The speaker begins with enthusiasm about AI-generated artwork and its controversial reception. They recount the positive response to their previous video, which involved redrawing AI artwork and discussing its flaws. Motivated by the success, they decide to continue the series, taking on three new AI-generated pieces. The speaker clarifies that their redraws are not meant to be copies but will involve changes to character designs to correct logical issues or enhance refinement. They also address potential concerns about taking inspiration from AI pieces, emphasizing that their approach is for fun and not to claim others' characters as their own.


🖌️ Artwork Redraw Process and Style Experimentation

The artist dives into the process of redrawing the first AI-generated piece, discussing the inconsistencies and illogical aspects of the original artwork. They describe their creative decisions in changing the character's pose, accessories, and outfit, aiming for a more coherent design. The speaker also reflects on their previous video's success and the mixed reactions it received, using it as motivation to continue their work. They then detail their approach to sketching and experimenting with different tools and styles, including the use of the regular G-Pen and their choice to simplify the background for focus.


🌟 AI in Art and Animation: A Critical Perspective

The speaker transitions to a discussion about the role of AI in art and animation, citing examples from 'Final Fantasy VII' and 'Spiderman: Across the Spiderverse'. They argue that while AI can be a useful tool for certain tasks, it should not replace the human element in art creation. The artist emphasizes the importance of originality and human effort in producing quality artwork. They also touch upon the ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated art and the potential for it to displace human artists. The speaker then returns to their redraw process, describing their approach to coloring and shading, and their decision to experiment with a more painterly style.


🧙‍♀️ Redrawing the Witch-Hat Character and Reflecting on AI's Impact

The artist concludes with the redraw of a character wearing a witch hat, noting the inconsistencies in the original AI artwork. They describe their process of sketching, referencing real-life images for hairstyle inspiration, and making design changes to the character's dress and accessories. The speaker also discusses their choice to use a more simplistic composition for this piece. They reflect on the broader implications of AI in the art world, advocating for the importance of original human creativity and the need to challenge AI's role in art. The artist finishes by encouraging viewers to support their work and engage with their content, and they invite feedback on their redraws.



💡AI Art

AI Art refers to artwork that is generated or significantly influenced by artificial intelligence. In the video, the creator discusses redrawing AI-generated artwork and shares their thoughts on the quality and originality of such art. It's a central theme as the video revolves around the process of reimagining AI art with human creativity.


Redrawing involves taking an existing piece of art and recreating it, often with modifications or improvements. The artist in the video uses redrawing as a method to demonstrate the differences between AI-generated art and human-created art, emphasizing the value of human input in the artistic process.


Consistency in art refers to the uniformity or coherence of elements within a piece, such as style, color, and design. The video script mentions inconsistencies in AI art, like varying hairstyles and outfit details, which the artist corrects during the redrawing process to improve the overall design.

💡Character Design

Character design is the process of creating the visual appearance of a character in art, including their physical features, clothing, and accessories. The video focuses on altering and refining the character designs from AI-generated works to make them more logical and aesthetically pleasing.

💡Logic Problems

Logic problems in art refer to elements that do not make sense within the context of the artwork or the character's design. The artist points out logic problems in the AI-generated pieces, such as floating objects or illogical poses, which are addressed during the redrawing process.


Reception refers to how an audience responds to a piece of work. The video mentions the 'absolutely insane reception' of the previous video, indicating the strong engagement and feedback from viewers, which motivates the artist to continue the series.

💡Art Theft

Art theft in the context of the video refers to the unethical practice of taking another artist's work and claiming it as one's own, which the artist strongly criticizes. The video advocates for original creation and the importance of giving credit to the original artists.

💡Generative AI

Generative AI is a type of artificial intelligence that can create new content, such as images, based on existing data. The video discusses the controversial use of generative AI in creating artwork, highlighting the importance of human creativity and effort in art.


Sketching is an early stage in the art process where an artist roughly outlines their ideas. The video describes the artist's sketching process, including the use of different tools like the pen or pencil tool, and how it sets the foundation for the final artwork.


Lineart refers to the black lines that define the shapes and outlines in a drawing. The artist discusses their approach to lineart, including the decision to use a different pen tool for a specific style, which is a crucial step in refining the artwork.


Shading is the technique of adding depth and dimension to a drawing by using different tones and colors. The video describes the artist's shading process, including the use of multiply layers and add glow layers, to give life and realism to the characters.


Artist is redrawing AI-generated artwork and sharing insights on AI art.

The first video on AI art received an overwhelmingly positive response.

The artist plans to continue making a series about redrawing AI art.

Redrawings will not be exact copies but will address logical and design flaws.

The artist emphasizes that any character designs inspired by AI pieces will be significantly changed.

The artist critiques the inconsistent and illogical elements in AI-generated images.

AI art is described as an 'affront to the Art Gods', highlighting the artist's skepticism.

The video discusses the use of AI in the remake of Final Fantasy VII for facial expressions and camera positioning.

AI was also utilized in the film 'Spiderman: Across the Spiderverse', but not for取代 (replacing) artists.

The artist argues that AI should be a tool for artists, not a replacement.

The artist changes their shading technique to a more painterly style in the redraws.

The artist uses a pastel blue background to complement the character's color scheme.

The artist's redraws aim to maintain the general aesthetic while making significant design changes.

The artist discusses the potential of AI to assist with menial tasks in the art industry.

The artist criticizes those who use AI to generate art without putting in the effort to learn and create original work.

The artist suggests that generative AI may start feeding off AI-generated images, creating a recursive loop.

The artist humorously threatens to put a whoopee cushion in the chair of those who are impolite in the comments.

The artist invites viewers to support them through likes, shares, subscriptions, and by checking out their social media and shops.