UNstable Diffusion and their crimes - Art theft | Copyright violation | Lies

Vixen with Scissors
17 Dec 202206:17

TLDRThe video script discusses the controversial topic of AI-generated art, specifically focusing on the 'Unstable Diffusion' model. The speaker, an artist, argues that this technology, which creates hyper-realistic images from text, equates to art theft as it uses pieces from other artists' works without consent. They highlight the ethical concerns of training AI on non-consensual data and the potential legal implications. The video also touches on the issues of data security and ownership in AI art platforms, emphasizing the importance of respecting original artists' rights and work.


  • 🎨 AI-generated art is considered by the speaker as imitation rather than original art.
  • 🚫 The speaker accuses Unstable Diffusion of art theft, suggesting it uses pieces from other artists' works without permission.
  • 💰 There is a commercial aspect to AI-generated art, with services charging for pictures generated from user input.
  • 🖼️ The speaker is an artist themselves and believes that AI-generated art disrespects the work of human artists.
  • 📚 The issue of AI art is tied to legal rights and the ethics of training AI on artists' works without consent.
  • 🌐 The speaker mentions specific platforms and apps that facilitate AI-generated art, raising concerns about data security and privacy.
  • 🤖 The debate around AI art is not just about technology but also about the value and authenticity of creative work.
  • 🔒 The speaker suggests that AI-generated art platforms might not respect user privacy or ownership of the generated content.
  • 📈 The use of AI in various fields, such as marketing, is highlighted with a mention of LinkedIn's use of AI for campaigns.
  • 🌟 The speaker concludes with a call to prioritize respecting others' work over the pursuit of visually appealing images.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue discussed in the video regarding AI generated art?

    -The main issue discussed is the ethical concerns and potential legal infringements related to AI generated art, specifically focusing on 'Unstable Diffusion' and its role in creating artworks that may infringe on the rights of original artists.

  • How does the speaker describe the AI generated art model 'Unstable Diffusion'?

    -The speaker describes 'Unstable Diffusion' as a model that generates hyper-realistic pictures from text, but criticizes it for using pieces of other artists' work without permission, equating it to theft.

  • What is the speaker's stance on AI generated art?

    -The speaker is against AI generated art, considering it as theft rather than genuine art creation. They argue that it's problematic if the AI is not trained on an ethical data set, as it infringes on artists' legal rights.

  • How does the speaker feel about technological advances in general?

    -The speaker expresses support for technological advances and their integration into daily life and art processes, provided that they are used ethically and do not infringe on the rights of artists.

  • What was the speaker's experience with 'The Time Machine' from their Heritage?

    -The speaker tried 'The Time Machine' and found the results to be interesting but not without questionable aspects. However, they only used it as an inspirational tool and did not present it as art, respecting the AI logo requirement for disclosure.

  • What is the problem the speaker identifies with AI generated art ownership?

    -The speaker points out that with some AI art generation apps and websites, users do not actually own the art they create, which raises concerns about the control and exploitation of their images and data.

  • What potential risks does the speaker mention about AI technologies?

    -The speaker mentions that according to Jurgen Smithfield, AI technologies pose risks in the near future, particularly in the context of data security, and could potentially go out of control very quickly.

  • How does the speaker view the use of AI in marketing campaigns as mentioned in the script?

    -The speaker refers to a specific instance where AI was used on LinkedIn to generate a marketing campaign based on a prompt, which resulted in horrendous outcomes, indicating that AI may not always produce desirable results in creative fields.

  • What is the speaker's conclusion about AI art and its comparison to real art?

    -The speaker concludes that AI art is an imitation of real art and lacks the soul of genuine human creativity. They emphasize the importance of respecting original artists' work over the pursuit of creating pretty images.

  • What advice does the speaker leave the audience with?

    -The speaker advises the audience to reflect on what is truly important in life, questioning whether it should be the pursuit of pretty images or the respect for the work of others, and encourages them to take the issues discussed in the video to heart.



🎨 AI Generated Art: A Controversial Topic

The first paragraph introduces the topic of AI-generated art, specifically focusing on the 2022 model known as 'stable diffusion.' The speaker, an artist, expresses strong opposition to this technology as it generates hyper-realistic images from text, often using elements from existing artworks without permission. The speaker argues that AI-generated art is not original art but theft, and criticizes the model for not being trained on ethical datasets, leading to legal and ethical issues. They also share their personal experience with a similar tool, 'The Time Machine,' noting that while it can be used for inspiration, it should not be mistaken for original art. The speaker emphasizes the importance of respecting artists' rights and the potential dangers of AI technologies, such as data security risks and the misuse of personal images.


🤖 The Imitation of Life and Art

The second paragraph continues the discussion on AI and its implications, focusing on the difference between robots imitating life and AI imitating art. The speaker shares a negative experience with AI in marketing on LinkedIn, highlighting the potential for AI to produce poor results. The speaker concludes by reminding the audience that while AI can create images, it lacks the soul of true art. The message is to prioritize respecting original work and the efforts of artists over the pursuit of AI-generated, imitation art. The speaker ends the video with a call to reflect on the importance of valuing genuine creativity and the human element in art.



💡UNstable Diffusion

UNstable Diffusion refers to a type of AI model that generates images from text inputs. In the context of the video, it is portrayed negatively as it is associated with art theft and copyright violations. The speaker argues that this model uses pieces of other artists' work without permission, thus undermining the originality and value of true art.

💡Art theft

Art theft is the act of taking or using someone else's artistic creation without their consent. In the video, the speaker accuses AI-generated art models like UNstable Diffusion of being digital grave robbers, as they allegedly steal styles and elements from existing artworks to produce new images, infringing on the original artists' rights.

💡Copyright violation

Copyright violation occurs when someone uses copyrighted material without the rights holder's permission. The video emphasizes that AI-generated art models may violate copyright laws by using artists' works without ethical considerations or obtaining proper licenses, leading to legal and ethical issues.

💡AI-generated Arts

AI-generated Arts are artworks created with the help of artificial intelligence, specifically AI models that can interpret text descriptions to produce visual images. The video's speaker is critical of this practice, arguing that it is not a genuine form of art but rather an imitation that lacks the creative effort and originality of human-made art.

💡Victor Frankenstein

Victor Frankenstein is a reference to the protagonist of Mary Shelley's novel 'Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus.' In the video, Dr. Victor Frankenstein 2022 is used metaphorically to represent the creators of AI art models, who, like Frankenstein, may have unintended consequences from their creation, such as the potential theft and devaluation of human art.

💡Hyper-realistic pictures

Hyper-realistic pictures are images that appear extremely lifelike and close to real-world objects or scenes. The video discusses how UNstable Diffusion can generate such pictures from text, which might seem impressive but are criticized for being unethically sourced and lacking in original artistic value.

💡Ethical data set

An ethical data set refers to a collection of data that is gathered and used in a way that respects legal, moral, and privacy standards. In the context of the video, the speaker suggests that if AI art models were trained on ethical data sets, meaning they only used public domain or properly licensed content, it would be more acceptable to use them for inspiration rather than as a replacement for human art.

💡The Time Machine

The Time Machine, as mentioned in the video, is a specific application or tool that uses AI to generate images based on user input, such as heritage or personal characteristics. The speaker tried this tool and found the results to be questionable, emphasizing that even when AI tools claim to allow ownership of the generated art, there are still concerns about authenticity and ethical use of one's likeness.

💡Jurgen Smithfield

Jurgen Smithfield is presumably an expert or authority figure mentioned in the video who warns about the potential risks of AI-generated art technologies. The speaker cites Smithfield's concerns about the speed at which these technologies could spiral out of control, particularly in terms of data security and privacy.


LinkedIn is a professional networking platform that is mentioned in the video as an example of a service that has attempted to use AI for generating marketing content. The speaker criticizes the results as 'horrendous,' highlighting the potential pitfalls of relying on AI for creative tasks that require human intuition and expertise.


Robots, in the context of the video, are used metaphorically to represent AI and its imitation of human capabilities, including art creation. The speaker argues that while robots might mimic life, AI-generated art lacks the soul and genuine creativity of human-made art, urging the audience to value authentic human efforts over mere imitations.


Today's discussion is about AI-generated art, also known as 'digital grave robbery'.

AI-generated art is compared to Dr. Victor Frankenstein's creation, indicating its controversial nature.

The speaker is an artist who is strongly against AI-generated art, considering it as theft.

AI-generated art is criticized for using pieces of other artists' work without permission.

The speaker acknowledges the potential of technology but emphasizes the need for ethical training data sets.

Unstable diffusion is identified as the main culprit in the unethical practice of AI-generated art.

The speaker shares their personal experience with AI-generated art, using it as inspiration rather than as a final product.

Ownership of AI-generated art is questioned, with the speaker stating that artists should retain rights to their work.

The use of AI in art is likened to a 'cruel machine' that artists must fight against to protect their rights.

Data security concerns are raised, with the potential for personal images to be sold to companies quickly.

The speaker warns that AI-generated art lacks the soul of human-created art.

AI-generated art is seen as an imitation of life, just as robots are.

The importance of respecting others' work over creating pretty images is emphasized.

The speaker calls for a reflection on what is truly important in life, beyond AI-generated art.

The video aims to raise awareness about the ethical implications of AI-generated art.