capcut stole my edit.

11 Feb 202310:08

TLDRThe video discusses the creator's frustration with their original edit being turned into a template on the CapCut app without their consent or credit. They express concern over the ease with which creative work can be replicated and the potential loss of originality in editing, highlighting a broader issue with the app's approach to user-generated content.


  • 📌 The speaker feels their editing work has been stolen and repurposed by CapCut as a template.
  • 🎨 The edit in question was a creative piece the speaker was particularly proud of, originally posted on Instagram and TikTok.
  • 💡 The speaker initially dismissed concerns about their edit becoming a CapCut template, but later found it widely used.
  • 🚀 The template's popularity skyrocketed, with thousands of uses reported in a short span of time.
  • 🌐 The issue was not just a user-created edit but an official CapCut template accessible via TikTok.
  • 🎮 The edit was highly personal, likened to the speaker's 'baby', and seeing it replicated was emotionally challenging.
  • 🔍 The speaker analyzed the situation, noting that the original creative components were traced over with green screen technology.
  • 📈 The rapid replication and use of the template raised questions about the value of original creative work in the age of templates and AI.
  • 📧 The speaker contacted CapCut via email to express their concerns and seek resolution.
  • 🤝 The speaker urges other editors to value their work and be aware of how their creations are used by apps and platforms.
  • 💌 The speaker acknowledges the emotional impact of the situation and the broader implications for creative integrity in editing apps.

Q & A

  • What was the user's initial reaction to their edit being turned into a CapCut template?

    -The user felt upset and stressed, as they saw their original work being used and repurposed without their consent or credit.

  • When did the user first post the edit that was later turned into a CapCut template?

    -The user posted the edit on January 23rd, 2023.

  • How did the user describe their feelings towards their original edit before it was turned into a template?

    -The user was very proud of their edit, considering it one of their best works and likening it to their 'baby' or 'child'.

  • What was the user's initial expectation regarding the potential replication of their edit?

    -The user expected some level of replication or inspiration from others, but was not prepared for their edit to be directly turned into a CapCut template.

  • How did the user discover that their edit had been turned into a CapCut template?

    -The user found out when they were tagged in a TikTok video and saw the thumbnail, which looked like their original edit.

  • What was the user's reaction to the quality of the CapCut template compared to their original edit?

    -The user felt that their original edit was better and that the template was a direct copy of their work, but acknowledged that the creators of the template did a good job.

  • What action did the user take after discovering the CapCut template?

    -The user sent an email to CapCut expressing their concerns and disappointment about the situation.

  • How did the user feel about the rapid increase in the usage of the template?

    -The user was shocked and distressed by the exponential growth in the usage of the template, feeling that their creative integrity was being undermined.

  • What message did the user convey to other editors in the video?

    -The user urged other editors to value their work and be aware that the success of apps and companies like CapCut relies heavily on their creativity and contributions.

  • What was the user's final statement regarding the situation with CapCut?

    -The user expressed that while they were upset, they did not hold any hard feelings against CapCut, but there were definitely feelings involved.



🎬 Editor's Dilemma with Unwanted Trend

The speaker, an editor, discusses their experience of seeing their original work repurposed as a template on a popular editing platform. They express frustration and disbelief at how their creative work, initially posted on Instagram and TikTok, has been turned into a widely-used template without their consent or credit. The editor reflects on the implications this has for creative integrity in the age of easily accessible editing tools and templates, and the emotional impact it has on them as the original creator.


🔄 The Rapid Spread of Editing Templates

The speaker delves deeper into the issue of their edit being turned into a template, noting the rapid increase in its usage and the lack of recognition for their original work. They compare the situation to AI and the replication of creative ideas, highlighting the ease with which templates can be used and the potential loss of originality in editing. The editor also discusses their personal investment in the work, the public's reaction, and their decision to confront the company responsible for the template, advocating for greater respect for creative integrity.


💬 A Call to Action for Editors

In the final paragraph, the speaker addresses fellow editors, urging them to value their work and the impact they have on editing platforms. They share their decision to reach out to the company behind the template, expressing their hope for change in how original edits are treated. The speaker ends on a personal note, acknowledging the emotional weight of the situation and the support they've received from their community.




Capcut is a video editing application that allows users to create and edit videos with various features and templates. In the context of the video, the user expresses frustration that their original edit was taken by Capcut and turned into a template, which others can use without giving credit to the original creator. This raises concerns about creative integrity and the ease with which original work can be replicated and claimed as someone else's.


An edit refers to the process of modifying and enhancing video footage to create a final product. In the video, the user is a video editor who takes pride in their work, and is upset when their creative edit is used by Capcut without permission or attribution. The term 'edit' is central to the video's theme, as it represents the user's craft and the violation of their creative rights.


Creativity is the use of imagination or original ideas to create something new and valuable. In the video, the user emphasizes the importance of creative integrity in their work, expressing disappointment that their creative efforts are easily replicated and distributed by others, particularly through the Capcut app. The term 'creativity' is a key concept as it underpins the user's passion for their craft and their frustration with the lack of recognition for their original work.


A template is a pre-designed format or layout that can be used as a starting point for creating new content. In the context of the video, the user's original edit was turned into a template by Capcut, allowing other users to easily recreate the style and effects of the original work without the need for their own creative input. This raises concerns about the value of originality and the potential devaluation of creative work in the face of such easy replication.


Copyright refers to the legal rights that creators have over their original works, which includes the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, and display the work. In the video, the user mentions the lack of legal copyright over their edit, which complicates their ability to protect their work from unauthorized use by Capcut and others. The term 'copyright' is significant as it relates to the user's struggle to maintain control and recognition for their creative work.

💡 TikTok

TikTok is a social media platform where users can create and share short videos. In the video, the user discusses how their original edit was posted on TikTok and how it was later turned into a Capcut template, which was then promoted through TikTok links. The platform plays a central role in the narrative as it is both the place where the user's work was initially appreciated and where the issue of unauthorized replication became evident.


Feedback refers to the opinions, comments, or responses that people give about something, in this case, the user's video edit. The user mentions receiving a lot of positive feedback on their work, which indicates its popularity and quality. However, the feedback also included comments about the edit potentially turning into a Capcut template, which foreshadowed the issue that the user later faced.


To replicate means to make an exact copy or duplicate of something. In the video, the user is upset that their original edit was replicated by Capcut as a template, allowing others to use it without acknowledging the original creator. This highlights the ease with which creative work can be copied and the challenges faced by creators in protecting their intellectual property.

💡original work

Original work refers to a creation that is the product of someone's own creativity and effort, not derived from existing works. In the video, the user's edit is described as an original work that they are proud of and have invested significant time and energy into. The term is important as it underscores the value of the user's creative effort and the infringement felt when that work is used without permission.


Credit, in this context, refers to the acknowledgment and recognition given to the creator of a work. The user expresses disappointment that their original edit, once turned into a Capcut template, does not receive proper credit, as it is used and shared by many without acknowledging the original creator. The term 'credit' is significant as it relates to the respect and validation that creators seek for their contributions.

💡emotional driven

Emotional driven means being influenced or motivated by feelings rather than logic or reason. The video is described as emotionally driven, indicating that the user's response to the situation with Capcut is guided by their feelings of frustration, disappointment, and passion for their work. This term highlights the personal and affective aspect of the user's experience with the issue of their work being used without consent.


The editor expresses frustration over their work being turned into a template by CapCut without consent.

The original edit was posted on January 23, 2023, and received positive feedback for its creativity.

The editor had anticipated that their work might be replicated, but not to the extent of becoming a template.

CapCut's integration with TikTok allows for easy template usage, contributing to the rapid spread of the edit.

The editor's work pride is evident as they describe their edit as their 'baby'.

The template's rapid rise in usage, from 5,000 to 136,000 in a short span, is highlighted.

The editor's concern over the erosion of creative integrity in the editing community due to templates is discussed.

The editor's personal investment of two to three weeks in creating the original edit is mentioned.

The ease with which original creative work can be replicated and used as templates is compared to AI technology.

The editor has contacted CapCut to address the issue of their work being used without credit or compensation.

The video ends with a call for editors to value their work and recognize their contribution to the success of editing apps.

The editor reflects on the potential viral nature of their work and the misattribution of credit to CapCut.

The issue of creative work being stolen and turned into templates is presented as a systemic problem within the app.

The editor's emotional response to the situation, including feelings of sadness and frustration, is shared.

The video serves as a cathartic release for the editor, expressing their concerns and seeking support from their audience.

The editor acknowledges the complexity of the issue and the potential for constructive dialogue with CapCut.