PHOTOPEA MAGIC REPLACE VS LUMINAR NEO GENERASE: COMPARING CHEAPER ADOBE GENERATIVE AI ALTERNATIVES:

Take Better Photos
24 Aug 202408:01

TLDRThis video compares two budget-friendly alternatives to Adobe's generative AI, Luminar Neo's Generas and Photopea's Magic Replace. Both tools aim to remove unwanted objects and fill in gaps with AI-generated content. While Generas is limited to a single selection tool and no edge detection, Magic Replace supports multiple selection tools and stores each generation in a layer for better control. The comparison shows Magic Replace producing more natural results, especially with faces and body parts, making it the superior choice. The video also notes that both tools are useful for complex removal tasks and are continually improving.

Takeaways

  • 😀 Luminar Neo and Photopea offer generative AI alternatives to Adobe Creative Cloud at a lower cost.
  • 🔍 Luminar Neo's Generas tool, launched in October 2023, is designed to remove unwanted objects and fill in gaps with matching textures.
  • 💰 A subscription to Luminar Neo costs $49 a year, and a perpetual license is available for $79, significantly less than Adobe's subscription.
  • 🚫 Generas has limitations, including support for only one selection tool, no edge detection, and no ability to choose between multiple generations.
  • 🔄 Generas does not store previously generated images, making it difficult to revert to a previous state if needed.
  • 🎨 Photopea's Magic Replace, released in May 2023, requires a premium service with various pricing options, starting from $8 per month.
  • 🛠️ Magic Replace supports a variety of selection tools, including powerful 'select subject' and conventional tools like lasso and brush.
  • 📚 Photopea stores each generated image in a layer, providing more flexibility to choose the best result from previous generations.
  • 🏆 In a slideshow comparison, Photopea's Magic Replace was deemed superior for producing better-looking faces and handling body parts and large objects more naturally.
  • 🔧 Both Magic Replace and Generas are useful tools that can perform complex removal tasks more effectively than traditional clone and stamp tools.
  • 🆕 Luminar Neo is set to release an update in October to improve its generative AI capabilities, promising more detailed and realistic image generation.

Q & A

  • What are the two generative AI alternatives to Adobe Creative Cloud discussed in the video?

    -The two generative AI alternatives discussed are Luminar Neo's 'Generas' and Photopea's 'Magic Replace'.

  • When was Luminar Neo's 'Generas' tool launched?

    -Luminar Neo's 'Generas' tool was launched in October 2023.

  • What is the annual subscription cost for Luminar Neo?

    -The annual subscription cost for Luminar Neo is $49, which is less than half the cost of an Adobe Creative Cloud subscription.

  • What are the limitations of Luminar Neo's 'Generas' tool?

    -The limitations of 'Generas' include support for only one selection tool (a brush with no edge detection), returning only one result at a time without multiple generation options, and not storing previously generated images.

  • When was Photopea's 'Magic Replace' feature released?

    -Photopea's 'Magic Replace' was released in May 2023.

  • What are the pricing options for Photopea's premium service?

    -Photopea's premium service is available for $8 per month, $15 for three months, or $50 per year.

  • How does Photopea's 'Magic Replace' handle image generation storage compared to Luminar Neo's 'Generas'?

    -Photopea's 'Magic Replace' stores each generated image in a layer, allowing users to access and choose from previous generations, unlike 'Generas' which does not store previous images.

  • What is the main advantage of Photopea's 'Magic Replace' over Luminar Neo's 'Generas' according to the video?

    -Photopea's 'Magic Replace' tends to produce better-looking faces, more natural body parts, and handles large object removals more effectively than 'Generas'.

  • Are both 'Magic Replace' and 'Generas' considered useful tools despite their imperfections?

    -Yes, both 'Magic Replace' and 'Generas' are considered useful as they can perform complex removal tasks better than conventional tools like clone and stamp.

  • What update is Luminar Neo expected to release to improve its generative AI?

    -Luminar Neo is expected to release an update in October that will improve the generative AI to produce more detailed and realistic images at a higher success rate.

  • How many attempts were each tool limited to in the slideshow comparison?

    -Each tool was limited to a maximum of three attempts in the slideshow comparison to test their accuracy and reliability.

Outlines

00:00

🤖 Generative AI Tools for Photo Editing

This paragraph introduces two cost-effective alternatives to Adobe Creative Cloud for generative AI photo editing: Luminar Neo's Generas and PhotoPiece's Magic Replace. The video aims to compare their object removal capabilities via generative AI. Luminar Neo, launched in October 2023, offers a tool that seamlessly fills in unwanted areas with matching textures and elements, priced at $49 per year or a one-time payment of $79 for perpetual use until January 1, 2026. However, it has limitations, including the use of only one selection tool without edge detection, single result generation without multiple options, and no storage of previous images. PhotoPiece Magic Replace, released in May 2023, requires a premium subscription starting at $8 per month, offering around 3,000 credits or 1,000 generations per month. It supports various selection tools, including 'select subject' and stores each generated image in a layer for better result access.

05:05

🏆 Comparing Generative AI Photo Editing Tools

The second paragraph presents a slideshow comparison of the two tools, limiting each to three attempts per image to test accuracy and reliability. The narrator shares their analysis, concluding that PhotoPiece Magic Replace is the superior alternative due to its better performance in generating more natural-looking faces, body parts, and handling large objects. Despite the limitations of both tools, they are deemed useful for complex removal tasks compared to traditional methods. The paragraph concludes with the anticipation of Luminar Neo's upcoming update in October, promising improved AI generation for more detailed and realistic images, and an invitation for viewers to share their thoughts and other cost-effective alternatives in the comments.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Generative AI

Generative AI refers to artificial intelligence systems that can create new content, such as images, text, or music, based on existing data. In the context of the video, generative AI is used to augment photo editing by removing unwanted objects and filling in the gaps with content that matches the surrounding area. This technology is highlighted as an alternative to Adobe's offerings, with the video comparing two tools—Luminar Neo's Generas and Photopea's Magic Replace—that utilize generative AI for photo editing purposes.

💡Luminar Neo

Luminar Neo is a photo editing software that was mentioned in the video as one of the cheaper alternatives to Adobe's Creative Cloud. It features a tool called 'Generas' which is used for removing unwanted objects from photos. The video discusses the limitations and capabilities of Luminar Neo, including its subscription cost and the performance of its generative AI tool in comparison to Photopea's Magic Replace.

💡Photopea

Photopea is another photo editing software that competes with Adobe's tools. It offers a premium service called 'Magic Replace' that uses generative AI to remove objects from images. The video script highlights the advantages of Photopea's Magic Replace over Luminar Neo's Generas, such as its ability to use various selection tools and store multiple generated images for comparison.

💡Adobe Creative Cloud

Adobe Creative Cloud is a subscription service by Adobe that provides access to a suite of creative software, including Photoshop, which is widely used for photo editing. The video discusses generative AI alternatives to Adobe's offerings, positioning Luminar Neo and Photopea as more cost-effective options for users who may not find the Adobe subscription to their liking.

💡Subscription Model

The subscription model refers to the business model where customers pay a recurring fee to access a service or product. In the video, both Luminar Neo and Photopea offer subscription plans that are compared to Adobe's Creative Cloud subscription in terms of cost. The video discusses the annual cost of Luminar Neo's subscription as being less than half of Adobe's, making it a more affordable option for users.

💡Perpetual License

A perpetual license is a one-time payment that grants the buyer indefinite use of the software. The video mentions that Luminar Neo offers a perpetual license for a one-time fee of $79, contrasting with the ongoing subscription model. This provides an alternative for users who prefer not to commit to a recurring payment.

💡Masking Tools

Masking tools in photo editing software are used to select specific areas of an image for manipulation while keeping the rest of the image unchanged. The video points out that Luminar Neo's Generas has limitations regarding masking tools, as it only supports a single brush tool without edge detection, unlike Photopea's Magic Replace which supports various selection tools.

💡Image Generation

Image generation in the context of the video refers to the process of creating new images or parts of images using generative AI. Both Luminar Neo and Photopea use this technology to fill in areas after objects have been removed. The video compares the quality and reliability of image generation between the two tools, with Photopea's Magic Replace being noted for producing more natural-looking results.

💡Layer

In photo editing, a layer is a separate element that makes up a composite image. The video explains that Photopea's Magic Replace stores each generated image on a separate layer, allowing users to compare and choose the best result. This is contrasted with Luminar Neo's Generas, which does not store previous generations, limiting the user's ability to revert to a previous state.

💡Cost-effective

Cost-effective refers to the quality of providing the maximum value for the money spent. The video's main theme revolves around finding cost-effective alternatives to Adobe's expensive Creative Cloud subscription. Both Luminar Neo and Photopea are presented as options that offer similar functionality at a lower price point, making them attractive to users looking for budget-friendly solutions.

Highlights

Photopea Magic Replace and Luminar Neo Generas are two cheaper generative AI alternatives to Adobe Creative Cloud.

Generative AI tools can remove challenging objects and fill in gaps with matching textures and elements.

Luminar Neo's Generas tool was launched in October 2023 and costs $49 a year for a subscription.

Generas has limitations such as only supporting a single selection tool and no edge detection.

Generas provides only one result at a time without the ability to choose between multiple generations.

Photopea Magic Replace was released in May 2023 and requires a premium service for use.

Photopea's premium service offers 3,000 credits or 1,000 Generations a month for a yearly fee of $50.

Magic Replace supports various selection tools, including powerful 'select subject' and conventional tools.

Photopea stores each generated image in a layer, allowing access to the best-looking result from previous generations.

The slideshow comparison tests each tool's accuracy and reliability with a maximum of three attempts per image.

Photopea Magic Replace is considered the clear winner for producing better-looking faces and body parts.

Magic Replace handles large objects more effectively than Generas, as demonstrated in the slideshow.

Both Magic Replace and Generas are useful for complex removal tasks, outperforming traditional clone and stamp tools.

Luminar Neo has announced an update in October to improve generative AI for more detailed and realistic images.

The video encourages viewers to share their thoughts on which tool they believe is the winner.

The video also invites viewers to comment on any other cost-effective Adobe generative fill alternatives.

The presenter expresses excitement to test the upcoming Luminar Neo update.

The video concludes with a call to like, subscribe, and share to support the creation of more content.