2 Months Using Turkesterone (Results and Final Thoughts)
TLDRIn this video, Scott shares his two-month experience with Black Forest Terkestrone, discussing its effects on strength, energy, and recovery. He notes individual responses vary, with some clients seeing significant gains and others experiencing minimal benefits. Scott speculates the product may contain more beta-ecdysterone than terkestrone, based on recent testing revelations in the industry. He emphasizes the importance of transparency and rigorous testing in supplement companies, urging viewers to approach supplements with an open yet critical mind.
Takeaways
- 🏋️ Scott, the 'jack brother coach', has completed a two-month supply of Black Forest Terkestrone and shares his final review.
- 💪 Scott noticed strength gains and improved mood among his clients who used the supplement, with varying degrees of response.
- 📈 Scott's personal strength gains were significant, particularly in the hack squat exercise, where he increased weight and repetitions.
- 🔬 There is skepticism about the actual presence of Terkestrone in supplements due to recent news about some brands containing little to none.
- 🤔 Scott suggests that the benefits he experienced might be due to Beta-Ecdysterone rather than Terkestrone, as research shows promise with the former.
- 🧘♂️ Scott's mental focus and training intensity have increased, which could also contribute to his progress.
- 💊 The supplement industry's transparency and testing methods are questioned, with a call for more advanced testing to verify claims.
- 📊 Scott experienced an increase in scale weight and slight fat gain, suggesting a need for a longer period to assess muscle gains accurately.
- 🔗 Scott provides a link for Black Forest Terkestrone, disclosing that he will receive a commission for purchases made through it.
- 👀 The response to the Terkestrone controversy has been mixed, with some evidence-based individuals showing bias and a lack of open-mindedness.
- 🧐 Scott emphasizes the importance of personal experimentation with supplements, as individual responses can vary widely.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the review of the supplement 'Black Forest Terkestrone' and the personal experiences and results of the reviewer after using it for two months.
What are the benefits the reviewer claims to have experienced from using the supplement?
-The reviewer claims to have experienced benefits such as improved mood, better energy, endurance, and sleep, as well as strength gains in the gym and enhanced recovery.
What is the reviewer's stance on the presence of Terkestrone in the supplement?
-The reviewer is skeptical about the presence of Terkestrone in the supplement and suggests that it might be Beta-Ecdysterone that is causing the observed effects.
How did the reviewer's strength progress during the two months of using the supplement?
-The reviewer's strength progress included increasing the weight on the hack squat from 270 pounds for 9 repetitions to 290 pounds for 10 repetitions, and on the chest press from 270 pounds for 8 repetitions to 290 pounds for 6 repetitions.
What is the reviewer's opinion on the claims made by some companies regarding the Terkestrone content in their supplements?
-The reviewer believes that companies should use advanced testing methods like mass spectrometry to verify the Terkestrone content and be transparent about their findings.
What was the reviewer's reaction to the news about some popular brands of Terkestrone having little to no Terkestrone in them?
-The reviewer was not upset by the news and mentioned that recent research shows promise with Beta-Ecdysterone, suggesting that it might be the active component in the supplement.
What is the reviewer's advice for people considering trying the supplement?
-The reviewer advises people to take his experiences with a grain of salt, understand that individual responses to supplements can vary, and consider trying the supplement themselves to see how their body responds.
What is the reviewer's view on the importance of evidence-based approaches in the supplement industry?
-The reviewer emphasizes the importance of trusting companies that conduct advanced testing on their supplements and are transparent about their findings, suggesting a move towards more evidence-based practices.
How does the reviewer describe the controversy surrounding Terkestrone and the reactions of people in the fitness community?
-The reviewer describes the controversy as eye-opening, highlighting the biases of some individuals who claim to be evidence-based but quickly dismiss the potential of Terkestrone without sufficient research.
What is the reviewer's final recommendation for those interested in trying the supplement?
-The reviewer's final recommendation is to try the supplement for oneself, understand that results may vary, and to consider supporting the channel if one decides to purchase through the provided link.
Outlines
🏋️♂️ Personal Experience with Black Forest Terkestrone
Scott shares his final review of the Black Forest Terkestrone, a supplement he has been using for two months. He discusses the varied responses from clients who also tried the product, ranging from mood improvement to strength gains and better sleep. Scott emphasizes that he did not experience the steroid-like effects often touted by influencers. He details his own progress in the gym, particularly with the hack squat, where he increased his weight and repetitions, attributing this to the supplement's effects. He also mentions the role of other supplements in his regimen, such as Tongkat Ali and Fedoria Agrestis, which may have contributed to his experience. Scott's energy and focus have improved, and he speculates on the possible reasons behind his progress, including a two-month break from training.
📊 Mixed Responses and the Reality of Supplement Claims
In this paragraph, Scott addresses the variability in individual responses to the Black Forest Terkestrone supplement. He acknowledges that while some people show no significant benefits, others, like himself, may be 'hyper responders.' Scott discusses the difficulty in attributing gains to specific supplements and the importance of transparency in the supplement industry. He also touches on the controversy surrounding the presence of tricasterone in popular brands, which were found to contain little to none of the compound, and the need for advanced testing methods to verify supplement claims. Scott expresses his skepticism about the actual content of supplements and the importance of choosing companies that practice transparency and rigorous testing.
🔬 Skepticism, Open-mindedness, and the Trochestrone Controversy
Scott reflects on his initial skepticism towards trochestrone due to the lack of human research and the anecdotal evidence that has been building up. He talks about his decision to try the supplement despite his doubts and the positive results he experienced. The paragraph also discusses the reactions of others in the fitness community to the trochestrone controversy, highlighting the biases and the need for an open-minded approach to new research and supplements. Scott criticizes those who claim to be evidence-based yet dismiss trochestrone without sufficient research and encourages viewers to take all reviews, including his own, with a grain of salt, emphasizing the importance of personal experimentation.
📘 Conclusion and Call to Action for Personal Experimentation
In his concluding remarks, Scott summarizes his experience with the Black Forest Terkestrone and invites viewers to consider trying the supplement for themselves to see how their bodies respond. He provides a link for those interested in purchasing the product, noting that it will support his channel. Scott also encourages viewers to share their thoughts and experiences with trochestrone or beta-ectosterone in the comments section. He reminds viewers to subscribe to his channel and to share the video with others who might benefit from the information.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Turkestrone
💡Black Forest Terkestrone
💡Strength gains
💡Recovery
💡Non-responders
💡Beta-ectosterone
💡Influencers
💡Honest and transparent
💡Evidence-based
💡Skepticism
💡Personal experience
Highlights
Review of Black Forest Terkesterone after two months of use.
Some clients experienced improved mood and overall well-being, while others saw strength gains, better energy, endurance, and even better sleep.
No one experienced steroid-like effects as claimed by some influencers.
Author saw significant strength gains, such as increasing hack squat from 270 pounds to 290 pounds and bench press improvements.
Author noted improved joint health, recovery, and overall feeling of well-being.
A minor increase in testosterone levels from previous supplements (Tongkat Ali and Fadogia Agrestis) might have contributed to the results.
Despite vacation and a break from training, strength gains were sustained, suggesting the supplement’s effectiveness.
Black Forest Terkesterone might not contain actual Terkesterone but possibly Beta-Ecdysterone, which still shows promising results.
Author emphasized the need for advanced testing methods for supplement ingredients to ensure label accuracy.
Concerns raised about the lack of transparency in the supplement industry.
Importance of trusting only companies that use the most advanced testing methods and are transparent about it.
Some people are skeptical and biased against supplements like Terkesterone due to lack of human research.
Beta-Ecdysterone shows promise and might be effective even in low doses.
Author encourages personal experimentation to see how one’s body responds to the supplement.
Acknowledges that not everyone responds the same way to supplements and that individual experiences may vary.
Emphasis on the need for more research and transparency in the supplement industry.