Why AI art is now unpopular and its no surprise
TLDRThe video script discusses the decline in popularity of AI-generated art, arguing that the AI art community was misled with false promises and lacks a deep understanding of the true nature of art. The speaker asserts that art is a well-defined concept and criticizes the idea that AI can replicate the creative process of human artists. The script also touches on the impact of AI on the job market for artists and the potential for AI to shift towards video generation, which may further devalue the arts. The speaker encourages artists to reject the notion of 'talent' as an innate ability and to value their own creative efforts over reliance on AI.
Takeaways
- 📉 Declining Popularity - AI-generated art and channels are losing popularity as the novelty wears off and users seek authentic content.
- 🚧 Misleading Promises - The AI user base was initially drawn in with false promises, but the reality is that AI lacks the depth and nuance of human artistry.
- 🎨 Art's True Definition - Art is a well-defined concept with a rich history and scholarship, contrary to the belief that it's an ambiguous or subjective matter.
- 🚫 AI's Lack of Understanding - AI companies often make baseless claims about understanding creativity and imagination without employing real artists or experts in the field.
- 🌐 AI's Impact on Artists - AI-generated imagery has led to the devaluation of original art and the undermining of artists' efforts and creativity.
- 🤖 The Machine Behind the Art - AI art accounts are popular not because of the art itself, but because of the technology that generates it.
- 🎥 Shift to Video Content - The emergence of AI video generation is causing a shift from image-based content, which could potentially disrupt the social media landscape.
- 💡 The Value of Ideas - While AI might make it easy to visualize ideas, the true value of an idea comes from the labor, refinement, and personal touch that an artist adds to it.
- 🏢 Corporate Interests and AI - AI art often serves corporate interests, pushing propaganda and misleading information under the guise of creativity.
- 🔄 The Homogenization of AI Art - AI-generated images tend to look similar, lacking the unique artistic voice and variety found in human-created art.
- 💥 The Future of AI Art - The trend of AI art is temporary and unsustainable, with a grim future where AI-generated content is outsourced to take advantage of economically disadvantaged regions.
Q & A
Why is AI-generated art becoming unpopular?
-AI-generated art is becoming unpopular because it lacks the depth and human touch that real art has. It is seen as a machine-made product, lacking the personal connection and intricate details that make art valuable to people.
What is the speaker's stance on the idea that AI art is a form of artistic expression?
-The speaker strongly disagrees with the idea that AI art is a form of artistic expression. They argue that art is a well-defined concept with a long history of scholarship, and reducing it to a machine-made product is a misrepresentation of what art truly is.
How does the speaker view the impact of AI on the art world?
-The speaker views AI's impact on the art world as negative. They believe that AI undermines the value of human creativity and effort in art, and that it promotes a false understanding of what art is and how it is created.
What does the speaker suggest about the future of AI-generated image accounts?
-The speaker suggests that AI-generated image accounts will continue to decline in popularity. They believe that these accounts lack the ability to engage audiences on a personal level and that they will be overshadowed by the shift towards AI-generated video content.
Why does the speaker think AI art users got into it for the wrong reasons?
-The speaker believes that AI art users got into it for the wrong reasons because they were solely focused on the end product, neglecting the process and personal growth that comes with creating art. They argue that this focus on the product is unsustainable and lacks the depth that real art offers.
What does the speaker say about the role of art influencers in the popularity of AI art?
-The speaker criticizes art influencers for not speaking out against AI art sooner, suggesting that their silence or flip-flopping stance allowed AI art to become more popular than it should have been. They believe that influencers had a responsibility to guide their audience correctly.
What does the speaker mean when they say 'AI art popularized the idea that your ideas matter but they are worthless'?
-The speaker means that while AI art promotes the idea that anyone can bring their ideas to life, in reality,未经打磨和努力的想法是没有价值的。They argue that ideas need to be refined and worked on over time to become valuable, and AI art bypasses this essential process of growth and development.
What is the speaker's view on the concept of talent in relation to AI art?
-The speaker argues that the concept of talent is often used as an excuse by AI art users to justify their lack of success in creating meaningful art. They believe that talent is not an innate ability but rather the result of consistent effort and practice, which AI art bypasses.
How does the speaker feel about the future of jobs in the art industry with the rise of AI?
-The speaker is pessimistic about the future of jobs in the art industry due to the rise of AI. They predict that AI will not generate meaningful jobs but will instead lead to the outsourcing of art creation to economically disadvantaged countries where people can be exploited for cheap labor.
What advice does the speaker give to artists in response to the AI art trend?
-The speaker advises artists to continue creating authentic work and not to be swayed by the hype surrounding AI art. They encourage artists to value their own creativity and the human element in their work, and to speak out against the devaluation of art by AI.
What does the speaker suggest is the real threat of AI to the art world?
-The speaker suggests that the real threat of AI to the art world is the dehumanization of the creative process. They argue that AI undermines the value of human effort, personal expression, and the unique voice of individual artists, leading to homogenized and soulless art products.
Outlines
📉 The Decline of AI Popularity and Misunderstandings in Art
This paragraph discusses the waning popularity of AI, particularly in the realm of AI-generated art and channels. It highlights the false promises made to the AI user base and emphasizes the importance of understanding the true nature of art. The speaker, Sean, introduces himself and sets the stage for a discussion on why AI has become unpopular, its self-destructive trajectory, and the resilience of artists. The paragraph critiques the assumption that exposure to art equates to understanding art, and asserts that art is a well-defined concept with a rich history, contrary to popular AI-driven misconceptions.
🎨 The Misguided Notion of AI and Art
The speaker continues to dissect the flawed arguments supporting AI in art, challenging the idea that AI is a new medium of artistic expression. He argues against the notion that art is undefined and subjective, citing the existence of art scholarship and the clear definitions of art that have been established over the past century. The paragraph also addresses the misconception that AI art accounts are popular, pointing out their lack of impact compared to traditional art accounts. The speaker asserts that AI art's focus on the end product neglects the essence of art, which lies in the process and the artist's connection with the audience.
🚀 The Disruptive Impact of Sora and the Future of AI Art
In this paragraph, the speaker predicts the disruptive effects of Sora, a new development in AI technology, on the AI-generated image industry. He suggests that the shift from AI-generated images to AI-generated videos will lead to a migration of content creators, but questions their ability to succeed in the new medium. The speaker argues that the real impact will be on the art community, as media conglomerates may feel threatened by the potential replaceability of human artists with AI. This shift is expected to lead to more authentic engagements and a renewed focus on human creativity.
💡 The Overvaluation of Ideas and the Undermining of Human Effort
The speaker criticizes the AI art community for promoting the idea that one's ideas are valuable without the necessary labor and refinement. He argues that great ideas are not born great but become so through years of effort and refinement. The paragraph also touches on the negative impact of AI on the perceived value of art and the artist's role in society. The speaker calls for a reevaluation of the importance of human effort and creativity in the face of AI's impersonal output.
🤖 The False Promises of AI and the Plagiarism Debate
This paragraph delves into the false claims made by AI companies regarding their ability to understand and unleash creativity and imagination. The speaker points out the lack of expertise in these companies and challenges the idea that AI can replicate human creativity. He also discusses the potential dangers of surrendering creative rights and ownership to corporations, warning that this could lead to a loss of human rights and a future where human creativity is undervalued and replaced by corporate interests.
🌐 The Misunderstood Notion of AI and Its Impact on Society
The speaker addresses the misconceptions surrounding AI, particularly in the context of AI-generated imagery. He criticizes the defense of AI by equating it with other forms of AI technology, such as those used in smartphones and navigation. The paragraph emphasizes the unique risks associated with AI-generated art and the potential for it to homogenize creative output, leading to a loss of individual artistic voice. The speaker calls for a distinction between authentic creators and those who merely tweak AI-generated output, urging artists to value their own creativity and not to rely solely on machines.
🚫 The Illusion of Talent and the True Nature of Creativity
The speaker debunks the concept of innate talent, arguing that it is a myth that serves as a form of self-oppression. He asserts that creativity is not a product but a process, a series of decisions and efforts that are uniquely human. The paragraph criticizes AI for its inability to replicate this human process, suggesting that reliance on AI in art stifles true creativity. The speaker encourages artists to recognize the value of their own efforts and to reject the notion that they lack talent, instead focusing on the development of their skills and the cultivation of their artistic voice.
💸 The Economic Reality of AI and the Future of Art
The paragraph discusses the economic implications of AI in the art world, predicting that AI will not generate jobs but rather lead to the outsourcing of AI-related work to countries where labor is cheaper. The speaker argues that AI has devalued the art market, with AI-generated images being worth very little. He encourages artists to recognize their worth and to demand fair compensation for their work, suggesting that the true future of AI in art lies in the exploitation of cheap labor rather than the empowerment of artists.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI popularity
💡Artistic expression
💡AI-generated imagery
💡Authentic creation
💡Corporations and AI
💡Creative process
💡Art scholarship
💡AI-generated video
💡Art influencers
💡Talent
💡AI and jobs
Highlights
AI's popularity is declining, with image views on the decline and a general lack of interest in AI-generated channels.
The AI user base was misled with false promises, but the truth is that AI's course is set for its own demise.
AI users have a false assumption that they understand art due to their exposure to it, despite not having the expertise.
Art is a well-defined concept with a robust scholarship behind it, contrary to the belief that it's an unclear, ambiguous concept.
AI art accounts do not match the popularity or loyal fan base of actual art accounts, showing a lack of genuine connection.
AI art became unpopular because it introduced inexperienced individuals into the art world without proper guidance or understanding.
The emergence of Sora, a text-to-video generation tool, will disrupt the AI image generating game and potentially benefit artists.
AI-generated content users are migrating to video, which could lead to oversaturation and a lack of authenticity in the market.
People connect with people, not machines, which is why AI-generated YouTube accounts are not doing well.
Art influencers initially did not speak out against AI, which allowed it to become popular without proper understanding or regulation.
The idea that AI can unlock creativity is false, as creativity is a process and labor, not just an end product.
AI art popularized the notion that ideas matter more than the effort put into refining them, which is a flawed perspective.
AI companies are spreading misinformation about the nature of creativity and the human brain, making baseless claims.
AI art generation is about to face legal challenges regarding ownership and credit for the work produced.
The rise of AI art has led to a homogenization of styles, denying artists their unique voice and individuality.
AI art users often defend their use of AI by comparing it to other forms of AI in everyday life, which is a misinterpretation of the technology's impact.
The belief that AI will generate jobs is misguided, as the market for AI-generated content is not sustainable for artists.
Talent is a myth, and the idea that one lacks talent is a self-fulfilling prophecy that prevents personal growth and development.
Creativity is not a product but a process, and AI art generation bypasses the essential human element of creativity.
AI art does not contribute to artistic growth or development, and learning about art should come from human-led education, not AI.
The future of AI art looks grim, with the potential for it to be outsourced to economically disadvantaged countries, further devaluing the art market.