Accurately Rating Facial Attractiveness With A.I ? (blackpill)
TLDRThe video discusses the use of artificial intelligence to rate facial attractiveness, focusing on a website called PrettyScale.com. The site employs neoclassical canons, facial measurements, and symmetry to evaluate attractiveness. The host challenges the site with a photo of Kilian Murphy, receiving a score of 73%, which translates to 'good-looking'. However, the host criticizes the assessment for inaccuracies, such as the perceived 'wide face' and 'small forehead', which are attributed to hairstyle and not actual facial structure. The video emphasizes that computer algorithms lack the ability to perceive facial harmony, which is crucial for attractiveness. The host concludes that while AI apps can be fun, they are not fully reliable for measuring attractiveness due to their inability to consider ethnic differences and facial harmony, which is best assessed by the human eye.
Takeaways
- 🤖 The rise of AI has led to the development of apps that claim to accurately rate facial attractiveness.
- 📱 There are concerns about the trustworthiness of these apps and their ability to provide accurate facial measurements.
- 🧐 The methods used by PrettyScale.com include neoclassical canons and symmetry measurements, which are also used by surgeons.
- 📐 The website evaluates facial thirds, facial fifths, and interocular distance using the neoclassical canons.
- 🔍 PrettyScale.com may also use the golden ratio mask in its assessments.
- 🧑 The assessment of Kilian Murphy's face resulted in a 73% attractiveness rating, which the speaker found to be inaccurate in some aspects.
- 🤔 The speaker disagrees with some of the website's points, such as the assessment of a wide face and a small forehead.
- 👁️ The importance of facial harmony is emphasized, which the speaker believes a computer cannot accurately perceive.
- 🧘♂️ Ethnicity is also a factor in attractiveness, and not all facial ratios apply to all ethnicities.
- 🚫 The speaker concludes that app and website ratings are not a fully comprehensive method for measuring attractiveness at this time.
- 🎮 The speaker suggests using these apps and websites for fun rather than relying on them for serious assessments of attractiveness.
Q & A
What is the main subject of the video?
-The main subject of the video is the exploration of artificial intelligence's ability to accurately rate facial attractiveness using a website called PrettyScale.com.
What are neoclassical canons?
-Neoclassical canons are measurements used for proportional evaluations of the face, developed by architects in the 17th and 18th century, and often used as a reference by surgeons when planning surgical treatments.
How does PrettyScale.com measure facial attractiveness?
-PrettyScale.com uses a combination of neoclassical canons, eye spacing, facial thirds, facial fifths, and symmetry measurements to rate facial attractiveness.
Who is the challenging face used to test PrettyScale.com in the video?
-The challenging face used to test PrettyScale.com is that of Kilian Murphy.
What was the result of Kilian Murphy's facial attractiveness rating on PrettyScale.com?
-Kilian Murphy's facial attractiveness rating on PrettyScale.com was 73%, which the video suggests translates to 'good-looking' or 'Chad light'.
What are some of the points PrettyScale.com gave for Kilian Murphy's face?
-PrettyScale.com pointed out that Kilian Murphy has a wide face, a small forehead, good interocular distance, a good nose for the face, a normal mouth size, and a small chin, but also good facial symmetry.
What does the video suggest is lacking in the computer's assessment of facial attractiveness?
-The video suggests that the computer's assessment lacks understanding of human perception of facial harmony, the impact of ethnicity on facial ratios, and the ability to perceive how well facial features work together.
What is the video's stance on using AI apps or websites to measure attractiveness?
-The video suggests that while AI apps or websites can be used for fun, they are not a fully comprehensive method to measure attractiveness due to their limitations in assessing facial harmony and considering ethnic differences.
What is the importance of facial harmony according to the video?
-Facial harmony is important because it is about how well facial features come together and work together. It allows for some flaws to look good on the face and is perceived through the human eye, not by a computer.
What advice does the video give regarding the use of AI for facial attractiveness ratings?
-The video advises to use AI apps and websites for facial attractiveness ratings only for fun and not to rely on them as an accurate measure of one's attractiveness.
What does the video suggest about the future of AI in facial attractiveness ratings?
-The video suggests that current AI apps and websites are not yet fully proficient in accurately rating facial attractiveness, emphasizing the need for more in-depth facial ratio analysis and consideration of ethnic differences and facial harmony.
How can viewers get their faces evaluated by the video's presenter?
-Viewers can get their faces evaluated by the video's presenter by supporting the channel and following the link provided in the video description.
Outlines
🤖 AI and Facial Attractiveness Rating Apps
The video discusses the potential development of AI-driven smartphone apps or websites that rate facial attractiveness. It raises questions about the trustworthiness of such apps, their accuracy in providing facial measurements, and the methods they use to calculate attractiveness scores. The video will explore a website called PrettyScale.com, examining its methodology, testing its ratings, and discussing its accuracy. The speaker also offers to evaluate viewers' faces for a fee and directs them to their blog for further reading.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Artificial Intelligence
💡Facial Attractiveness
💡Smartphone App
💡Neoclassical Canons
💡Facial Measurements
💡Algorithm
💡Symmetry
💡Golden Ratio
💡Facial Harmony
💡Ethnicity
💡PrettyScale.com
Highlights
Artificial intelligence is expected to develop apps that rate facial attractiveness.
The reliability of these apps to provide accurate facial measurements and attractiveness scores is questioned.
The methods used by algorithms to generate attractiveness scores are discussed.
Prettyscale.com is a website that uses neoclassical canons for attractiveness measurement.
Neoclassical canons are aesthetic proportions developed in the 17th and 18th centuries.
The website measures facial thirds, facial fifths, and eye spacing for attractiveness.
Symmetry measurement is used by splitting the face into two parts down the middle.
The golden ratio mask might be utilized in the assessment process.
Killian Murphy's face was used as a challenging case for the website's rating system.
The results of Murphy's rating were 73%, translating to 'good-looking' or 'Chad light'.
The assessment pointed out specific features like wide face, small forehead, and good facial symmetry.
The video critiqued the assessment for inaccuracies, such as the perceived wide face.
Facial harmony, which computers may not perceive, is crucial for attractiveness.
Human perception is essential for understanding facial harmony and attractiveness.
Website and app ratings are not fully comprehensive methods to measure attractiveness.
These tools lack in-depth facial ratios and do not account for ethnicity.
Apps and websites should be used for fun rather than accurate attractiveness measurement.
Viewer opinions on the topic are invited in the comments section.
The video concludes by emphasizing the limitations of AI in assessing facial attractiveness.