Ideogram Ai vs Midjourney COMPARED Print on Demand

Philip Anders
18 Sept 202309:24

TLDRIn this video, the creator compares two AI design platforms, Mid-Journey and Ideogram, using various prompts for print-on-demand projects. They find that Ideogram excels at text generation but often falls short in graphic quality, while Mid-Journey leads in market with superior graphics, though sometimes struggles with text accuracy. The video explores the strengths and weaknesses of each platform and provides tips for achieving the best results, concluding that the choice depends on the specific needs of the design project.

Takeaways

  • 📌 The video compares two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, for print-on-demand tasks.
  • 🎨 Ideogram excels in text results but sometimes falls short in graphic quality compared to Mid-Journey.
  • 🐱 A prompt for a cat in a coffee cup resulted in a favorite outcome from Ideogram, with a correct spelling and appealing graphics.
  • 🍂 For a fall design in the shape of a hat, Ideogram provided better text results, but a spelling error was noted.
  • 🚀 Mid-Journey's strength lies in its long-standing presence and market leadership in AI-generated images.
  • 🦕 A dinosaur-themed sticker design was well-executed by Mid-Journey, showcasing detailed graphics and a variety of styles.
  • 🎃 A Halloween t-shirt design featuring a skeleton was better rendered by Ideogram, with accurate text and pleasing graphics for print-on-demand.
  • 🇺🇸 An American flag-themed design prompt yielded superior results from Mid-Journey, highlighting the platform's edge in graphic detail.
  • 🖼️ A tall format prompt for wall art was interpreted with a preferred style by Ideogram, reflecting personal preference in design outcomes.
  • 💬 There is a clarification on Ideogram's terms of service, specifying that while their services are for personal use, generated content can be used commercially without infringing on third-party rights.
  • 🔍 Users are advised to exercise caution and ensure they have the necessary permissions when using AI-generated content for commercial purposes.

Q & A

  • What is the main purpose of the video?

    -The main purpose of the video is to compare the results of two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, for print-on-demand prompts and to provide insights on their strengths and weaknesses.

  • What was the first prompt tested in the video?

    -The first prompt tested in the video was for a fall design in the shape of a hat.

  • What issue was found with the first design produced by Ideogram?

    -The issue found with the first design produced by Ideogram was a spelling error in the text.

  • How did the user address the spelling error in the first design?

    -The user addressed the spelling error by using the remix function and running the prompt again to correct the mistake.

  • What is the user's overall evaluation of the text results from Ideogram compared to Mid-Journey?

    -The user found that Ideogram generally produced better text results, while Mid-Journey excelled in creating better graphics.

  • What was the outcome of the comparison for the Halloween t-shirt design prompt?

    -For the Halloween t-shirt design prompt, Ideogram produced more pleasing results for print-on-demand, while Mid-Journey provided sharper and more accurate graphics but with less ideal styles for print-on-demand.

  • What clarification did Ideogram provide regarding the use of their platform for commercial purposes?

    -Ideogram clarified that they do not restrict the use of generated content for commercial purposes, but users should ensure they have the necessary permissions from third parties if the content involves copyrighted material or intellectual property.

  • How does the user describe the style of the American flag-themed design produced by Mid-Journey?

    -The user describes the style of the American flag-themed design produced by Mid-Journey as vintage, retro, distressed, and featuring a skull with a contour clear outline on a white background.

  • What was the user's preference for the tall format design suitable for wall art?

    -The user preferred the style of the tall format design produced by Ideogram, which featured cool colors and a minimalistic style.

  • What advice does the user give for users who want to explore Ideogram further?

    -The user highly recommends checking out another video where they provide a comprehensive overview of the Ideogram tool and its usage for design purposes.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 Comparison of Ideogram and Mid-Journey for Print-on-Demand Designs

The paragraph discusses a comparative evaluation of two AI design platforms, Ideogram and Mid-Journey, based on their performance in creating print-on-demand prompts. The author presents a fall design in the shape of a hat as the first test case, noting that Ideogram provided a visually appealing result but with a spelling error. The author also highlights the use of the 'remix' function to correct such mistakes. Mid-Journey's output for the same prompt is criticized for its poor text rendering but is acknowledged for its superior graphics. The paragraph further compares the platforms on a design featuring a cat in a coffee cup, where Ideogram's result is preferred for its correct spelling and style, despite occasional spelling issues. The author also discusses the use of parent images and the remix function for refining results. The paragraph concludes with a comparison of a Halloween-themed design, where Ideogram's style is deemed more suitable for print-on-demand, despite Mid-Journey's more detailed and accurate graphics.

05:01

📈 Analysis of Ideogram's Terms of Service for Commercial Use

This paragraph delves into the specifics of Ideogram's terms of service regarding commercial use of the generated content. The author clarifies a common misconception by explaining that while Ideogram's terms initially seemed restrictive, they have been clarified to allow personal and commercial use of the generated content, as long as it does not infringe on third-party intellectual property or copyrighted material. The author advises users to be cautious about the content they generate, especially if it involves recognizable brands or celebrities, to avoid legal issues. The paragraph ends with a recommendation for users to explore Ideogram further and a thank you note for watching the video.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡mid-journey

The term 'mid-journey' refers to an AI platform that is being compared with 'ideogram' in the context of generating print-on-demand designs. It is mentioned as having better graphics but sometimes struggling with text accuracy. The comparison is a central theme of the video, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each platform in producing visual content for commercial purposes.

💡ideogram

An AI platform that is being compared with 'mid-journey' for its performance in creating designs, particularly in terms of text accuracy and overall design quality. 'Idiogram' is noted for its ability to produce text results that are often more accurate, but its graphics may not be as polished as 'mid-journey's'. The comparison is used to evaluate which platform is more suitable for specific design needs.

💡print-on-demand

Print-on-demand refers to a service where products like t-shirts, mugs, and stickers are produced only when an order is received, allowing for customization without the need for inventory. The video focuses on evaluating the AI platforms' effectiveness in creating designs suitable for this market, emphasizing the importance of design quality and text accuracy for commercial viability.

💡text accuracy

Text accuracy is the correctness of the written words in a design, which is crucial for the clarity and professionalism of the final product. In the context of the video, 'ideogram' is often praised for its text accuracy, whereas 'mid-journey' sometimes struggles with this aspect, leading to designs with misspelled words.

💡graphics

Graphics in this context refer to the visual elements and images produced by the AI platforms for design prompts. The quality of graphics is a key factor in determining the appeal and effectiveness of the designs for print-on-demand products. 'Mid-journey' is often noted for its superior graphics, while 'ideogram' is seen as needing improvement in this area.

💡prompts

Prompts are the input requests or instructions given to the AI platforms to generate specific designs. They are essential in guiding the output of the AI, and the effectiveness of a platform can often be judged by the quality of its responses to various prompts.

💡remix function

The remix function allows users to modify existing images or designs to create new outputs. It is a feature that enables users to refine and improve upon AI-generated content to better suit their needs or preferences.

💡commercial purposes

Commercial purposes refer to the use of content, designs, or products with the intent of generating profit, typically by selling or marketing them. The video discusses the terms of service of 'ideogram' and its implications for using AI-generated content for commercial use, emphasizing the importance of not infringing on third-party rights.

💡terms of service

Terms of service are the legal agreements between a service provider and its users, outlining the rules and guidelines for using the service. In the context of the video, 'ideogram's' terms of service are discussed to clarify the permissible use of AI-generated content, particularly regarding commercial use and intellectual property.

💡设计风格 (design style)

Design style refers to the visual characteristics and aesthetic approach that define a particular piece of design work. The video discusses how different AI platforms excel in various design styles, such as typography, poster, or graffiti, and how these styles affect the suitability of the designs for print-on-demand products.

💡知识产权 (intellectual property)

Intellectual property refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions, literary and artistic works, designs, and symbols, names, and images used in commerce. The video emphasizes the importance of respecting intellectual property rights when using AI-generated content for commercial purposes, avoiding the use of AI to create designs that infringe on celebrities' or brands' rights.

Highlights

Comparison of ideogram and mid-journey for print-on-demand prompts

ideogram outperforms mid-journey in text accuracy for fall design prompt

mid-journey excels in graphics quality, especially for graphics without text

ideogram provides better text results for cat in a coffee cup design

Use of parent and remix functions to refine design styles

Sticker design comparison shows mid-journey's edge in detailed graphics

Halloween t-shirt design showcases ideogram's suitability for print-on-demand

Text accuracy issues in mid-journey's Halloween design results

American flag themed design demonstrates ideogram's potential in graphics

ideogram's results have a more pleasing style for certain print-on-demand applications

Clarification on ideogram's terms of service regarding commercial use

Users should ensure they have necessary permissions for commercial use of AI-generated content

ideogram does not restrict commercial use of generated content unless it infringes on third parties' intellectual property

Recommendation to check out ideogram for design creation

Personal preference plays a role in choosing between ideogram and mid-journey

Overall, ideogram and mid-journey have their strengths in different areas of design