FLUX 1.1 Deep Dive (NEW Frontier of Hyper-Realistic AI Photography)

CyberJungle
4 Oct 202418:32

TLDRThis video offers an in-depth comparison of Flux 1.1, a new AI photography model, against Flux Laura mid Journey 6.1 and Mystic version two. It evaluates their performance in prompt understanding, photo realism, detail accuracy, and illustrative art. Flux 1.1 stands out for its speed and cost-effectiveness, with Flux and Mystic competing closely in photo realism. Mid Journey excels in illustrative art but lags in prompt understanding. The video anticipates updates in AI video models and urges models to listen to user feedback for improvement.

Takeaways

  • 🚀 Flux 1.1 has been released, boasting improved speed and efficiency, being three times faster than Flux 1.0 Pro.
  • 🔍 The new Flux 1.1 has been tested against Flux Laura mid Journey 6.1 and Mystic version two for prompt understanding, photo realism, accuracy of details, and illustrative art.
  • 🎨 Flux 1.1 generated images include both photorealistic and illustrative art, with impressive detail such as eye details and fashion shots.
  • 📈 In terms of speed, Flux 1.1 is extremely fast, generating images in 20 seconds, and is cost-effective compared to close competitors.
  • 📋 The guidance setting is no longer available in Flux 1.1, which could impact how users interact with the model.
  • 🖼️ Flux 1.1 and Flux Laura had a realistic interpretation of prompts, but did not always visually represent the literal carrying of objects as described.
  • 👗 Flux 1.1 understood and applied a blueberry texture to a dress in a prompt, while other models took the blueberry as a pattern.
  • 🎭 When it comes to cinematic photography, Mid Journey and Mystic outputs were more cinematic than Flux versions.
  • 🏆 Mystic version two was the clear winner for photo realism, with Flux 1.1 coming very close.
  • 🤖 For illustrative style prompts, Mid Journey outperformed, showing its strength in artistic and abstract styles over Flux 1.1.
  • 🔄 All models have room for improvement in prompt understanding and accuracy of details, with Flux 1.1 doing relatively well in these areas.

Q & A

  • What is the main focus of the video?

    -The main focus of the video is a detailed comparison and analysis of the newly released Flux 1.1 in terms of prompt understanding, photo realism, accuracy of details, and illustrative art, compared to Flux Laura mid Journey version 6.1 and Mystic version two.

  • What was the mysterious image model called that appeared in the image arena?

    -The mysterious image model that appeared in the image arena was called Blueberry, which was later revealed to be Flux 1.1.

  • How does Flux 1.1 compare to its competitors in terms of speed and efficiency?

    -Flux 1.1 is suggested to be three times faster than the currently available Flux one Pro, with faster generation times and reduced latency, making it superior in speed and efficiency compared to its competitors.

  • What was the unique feature of the Blueberry model that was officially confirmed?

    -The unique feature of the Blueberry model that was officially confirmed is that it was actually Flux 1.1, and it scored the highest ELO score in comparison to other models.

  • How does the cost of Flux 1.1 compare to its close competitors?

    -Cost-wise, Flux 1.1 seems to be doing very well in comparison to its close competitors.

  • What was the prompt used to test the capabilities of Flux 1.1?

    -The prompt used to test Flux 1.1 was 'cinematic photo of a biomorphic robot in lizard shape, perfectly adapted to the environment, and a marvel of bioengineering with detailed textures and intricate details of biotech'.

  • What was the issue found with Flux 1.1 when compared to Flux 1.0 in terms of prompt understanding?

    -Flux 1.1, along with Flux Laura, had a realistic interpretation of the prompt but did not visually represent the literal carrying of a horse on a man's shoulders, thus the 'carrying' part of the prompt was not fully represented.

  • Which model was closest to the user's imagination for the prompt of a man carrying a horse on his shoulders?

    -Mid Journey was the closest to what the user imagined for the prompt of a man carrying a horse on his shoulders, although it was in black and white.

  • In terms of photo realism, which model was considered the clear winner among Flux 1.1, Flux Laura, and Mystic version two?

    -Mystic version two was considered the clear winner in terms of photo realism, with the most realistic output among all other models tested.

  • What was the main issue with Mid Journey's output when it came to the accuracy of details?

    -The main issue with Mid Journey's output was that the skin looked unrealistic, like plastic, and it struggled with the outfit description, particularly with placing polka dots on a T-shirt and a separate hoodie, and providing a proper firefighter hat.

  • What is the potential future development for Flux mentioned in the video?

    -The potential future development for Flux mentioned in the video includes the upcoming 2K resolution and rumors about a state-of-the-art video model, which would make Flux a direct competitor to AI video models like Runway, Clink, and Luma.

Outlines

00:00

🚀 Introduction to Flux 1.1

This paragraph introduces the focus of the video, which is to explore the newly released Flux version 1.1. The video will test and compare Flux 1.1 with Flux Laura mid Journey version 6.1 and Mystic version two across various metrics such as prompt understanding, photo realism, accuracy of details, and illustrative art. The discussion begins with the mysterious appearance of the 'blueberry' model, which later turns out to be Flux 1.1. The video highlights the impressive capabilities of Flux 1.1, including its photorealistic and illustrative art outputs, and mentions its superior speed and efficiency compared to previous versions. The comparison includes a look at the cost and speed of the models, with Flux 1.1 showing promising results. The paragraph ends with a test of Flux 1.1 using a specific prompt, demonstrating its ability to generate high-quality images quickly.

05:00

🤖 Prompt Understanding and Realism

The second paragraph delves into the prompt understanding capabilities of Flux 1.1, Flux Laura, and Mystic version two. It discusses the results of various prompts, including a man carrying a horse on his shoulders and a cinematic photo of two women in a cafe. The paragraph highlights that while Flux 1.1 and Flux Laura provided realistic interpretations, they failed to capture the literal 'carrying' aspect of the horse. Mid Journey was the closest to the imagined scene but produced a black and white image. Mystic struggled with the prompt, failing to place a horse on top of a man. The paragraph also discusses the challenges in achieving cinematic outputs and the ability of each model to differentiate between characters and outfits. It concludes with an appreciation for Flux Laura's ability to create distinct faces but notes that none of the models clearly won in terms of prompt understanding.

10:01

🏆 Photorealism and Detail Accuracy

The third paragraph compares the photorealism and detail accuracy of Flux 1.1, Flux Laura, and Mystic version two. It presents a variety of prompts, including a portrait of a tribal female warrior and a volleyball game scene, to test the models' abilities. The paragraph notes that while Mystic version two excels in photorealism, Flux 1.1 is a close second. Flux Laura struggles with skin realism in version 6.1, which is a step back from its previous version. The paragraph also discusses the accuracy of details in a volleyball scene, where Flux 1.1 performs well, and Flux Laura and Mystic have some issues with finger and leg positioning. The paragraph concludes with a discussion on illustrative art, where Mid Journey stands out, and Flux 1.1 and Mystic also provide good outputs, though not as strong as Mid Journey.

15:02

🔮 Future Prospects and Conclusion

The final paragraph discusses the future prospects and conclusions drawn from the comparison of Flux 1.1, Flux Laura, and Mystic version two. It notes that Flux 1.1 is competitive in photorealism and is the fastest model, making it cost-effective. The paragraph suggests that Flux is targeting Mystic's 4K resolution with its upcoming 2K resolution, indicating a competitive push. It also mentions rumors of Flux's video model, which could make it a direct competitor to AI video models like Runway and Luma. The paragraph calls for Mid Journey to catch up with its competitors, especially in photorealism, and expresses anticipation for its video model and storytelling mode. It also points out the need for Mystic to improve its workflow and offer consistent characters and styles. The conclusion emphasizes the fierce competition among the models and the importance of listening to user feedback to determine the ultimate winner. The paragraph ends with a call to action for viewers to like and subscribe to the channel for more content.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Flux 1.1

Flux 1.1 is the latest version of an AI photography model discussed in the video. It represents a significant advancement in the field of hyper-realistic AI-generated images. The video compares its capabilities with previous versions and other models, highlighting its improvements in speed and efficiency. Flux 1.1 is said to be three times faster than the current Flux Pro, and it has been tested for prompt understanding, photo realism, accuracy of details, and illustrative art. The video's narrator expresses excitement about its potential, especially in generating photo-realistic and illustrative art, as evidenced by the examples shown in the announcement and press release section of the transcript.

💡Prompt Understanding

Prompt understanding refers to the AI model's ability to accurately interpret and generate images based on the textual description provided by the user. In the context of the video, the narrator tests Flux 1.1, Flux Laura, Mid Journey, and Mystic version two with the same prompts to assess how well each model comprehends and visualizes the described scenes. The video aims to determine which model has the best prompt understanding by comparing the outputs and seeing which one aligns closest to the intended meaning of the prompts.

💡Photo Realism

Photo realism is a key concept in the video, describing the degree to which AI-generated images resemble real-life photographs. The narrator evaluates how realistically each model can depict scenes, textures, and details. For instance, when testing the models with a prompt describing a tribal female warrior, the video discusses the skin's realism, the intricacy of paint and feathers, and the overall lifelike quality of the outputs, with Mystic version two being praised for its photo realism.

💡Illustrative Art

Illustrative art is a style of image generation that leans towards a more artistic and stylized representation rather than strict photo realism. The video script mentions the narrator's desire to test Flux 1.1's capabilities in generating illustrative art, in addition to photo realism. An example from the script is the prompt for an ink style fantasy art of a sci-fi woman, where the models are assessed based on their ability to create a stylized and dynamic image that captures the action and setting described.

💡Speed and Efficiency

Speed and efficiency are highlighted as improved features of Flux 1.1, with the video emphasizing its faster generation times and reduced latency. The narrator mentions that Flux 1.1 is three times faster than Flux Pro, which is a significant advancement for users who value quick turnaround times for image generation. The script provides examples of the generation times for different models, with Flux 1.1 outperforming others in this aspect.

💡Mid Journey

Mid Journey refers to a specific version of the AI model being tested alongside Flux 1.1. It is mentioned in the context of its performance in prompt understanding and photo realism. The video script notes that Mid Journey's outputs sometimes struggle with certain aspects, such as outfit descriptions, but performs well in others, like differentiating between characters' faces. The narrator also expresses anticipation for Mid Journey's future updates, including a video model and storytelling mode.

💡Mystic Version Two

Mystic version two is another AI model compared in the video, known for its cinematic tendencies and photo realism. The script describes the model's outputs as having a cinematic vibe and being the most realistic among the tested models. However, it lacks features like consistent characters and style, which limits its use for generating AI films. The narrator suggests that Mystic version two needs workflow improvements to better compete with other models.

💡Blueberry

Blueberry is a code name mentioned in the video for the mysterious new image model that eventually turned out to be Flux 1.1. The term is used to describe the high performance of this model, which scored the highest ELO score compared to other models. The script mentions that there was speculation about the identity of Blueberry, with some suggesting it might be a new version of Dolly. The reveal that Blueberry is Flux 1.1 adds to the excitement and anticipation for the capabilities of the new model.

💡Replicate

Replicate is mentioned as the platform where the narrator tests the different versions of the AI models, including Flux 1.1 Pro. It is a website where users can interact with the AI models by inputting prompts and receiving generated images. The script describes the process of testing Flux 1.1 on Replicate, noting the absence of a guidance setting and the quick generation times, which are significant factors in evaluating the model's efficiency.

💡Consistent Characters

Consistent characters refer to the AI model's ability to generate images of the same character or subject with a consistent appearance across different prompts. This is an important feature for creating series or sequences that require uniformity in characters. The video script discusses how Mid Journey excels in creating consistent characters, while Flux Laura allows for training to achieve multiple consistent characters, and Mystic version two lacks this feature, which is a limitation when considering it for AI film generation.

Highlights

Flux 1.1 is tested and compared with Flux Laura mid Journey 6.1 and Mystic version two for prompt understanding, photo realism, accuracy of details, and illustrative art.

Flux 1.1 was previously known as the mysterious 'Blueberry' model, which scored the highest ERO compared to other models.

Flux 1.1 is claimed to be three times faster than the currently available Flux Pro, with superior speed and efficiency.

The announcement emphasized improved speed and cost, with Flux 1.1 being ready for testing on Replicate.

Flux 1.1 generated images include photorealistic ones as well as illustrative art, showcasing stunning details.

Flux 1.1 is compared with Flux 1.0, showing a significant difference in details and texture quality.

Flux 1.1 is faster than the free pick, generating images in 5 to 10 seconds less time.

Prompt understanding tests show Flux 1.1 and Flux Laura have a realistic interpretation, while Mid Journey is closest to the imagined output.

Flux 1.1 and Mid Journey understood the 'blueberry texture' prompt better than Mystic and Flux Laura.

Mystic version two struggled with the outfit description in the 'fashion photo' prompt.

Mystic version two is the clear winner for photo realism, with the most realistic output among all models.

Flux 1.1 and Flux realism performed well in terms of accuracy of details, especially in the 'volleyball players' prompt.

Mid Journey struggled with details in the 'volleyball players' prompt, showing issues with the net height and finger accuracy.

For illustrative style prompts, Mid Journey outperformed with the best output in the 'sci-fi woman' example.

Flux 1.1 is the fastest model among the tested, with a very cost-effective overall package.

Mid Journey is suggested to need catching up with other models in photo realism and prompt understanding.

The video discusses the potential for Flux to become a direct competitor to AI video models like Runway, Clink, and Luma.

Mid Journey is expected to release a video model and version 7 to keep up with the competition.

Mystic version two is noted for needing workflow improvements, especially in consistent characters and styles.

The video concludes that the model that listens to creators and user feedback will be the ultimate winner in the AI photography competition.