AI Generated Furry Art!? Can It Be Used To Make Furry Art Commissions?
TLDRIn this video, the creator explores the potential of AI-generated art in the furry community, testing its ability to produce commissions based on descriptions of fursonas. Using a website called NightCaff, the creator inputs various descriptions and examines the resulting images, highlighting the discrepancies and humorous outcomes. The video concludes that while AI art generation is an interesting concept, it is far from replacing the skill and creativity of human artists.
Takeaways
- 🎨 The video explores the use of AI in generating furry art and the controversy surrounding it.
- 💭 AI-generated art is often viewed as a form of art theft, as it seems to recombine existing images.
- 🦕 The creator conducted a social media experiment by asking for fursona descriptions without revealing the purpose.
- 🌐 The AI art generator used in the video is called NightCaff, offering various styles for the art.
- 🐺 The results of the AI-generated art varied greatly, with some being humorously off-target.
- 🎮 The AI struggled to incorporate specific elements like gaming into the art.
- 👎 The video suggests that AI art generation is not yet capable of replacing traditional artists.
- 🧐 The creator encourages viewers to support real artists and obtain original art legally and ethically.
- 🤖 The experiment showcased the limitations of AI in creating consistent, accurate, and desired outputs.
- 😂 The video is meant to be entertaining and encourages viewers to share their own AI-generated art mishaps.
- 📢 The creator invites the audience to join their Discord server to share their AI-generated art creations.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is the exploration of AI-generated art, specifically in the context of furry art commissions.
What is the controversy surrounding AI-generated art in the furry community?
-The controversy is that AI-generated art is seen by some as art theft, as the computer is accused of simply taking pre-existing images and combining them without originality.
How did the speaker obtain the descriptions for the AI art generator?
-The speaker obtained the descriptions by asking people on Twitter to describe their fursonas and an activity or item, without informing them of the actual purpose.
Which AI art generator was used in the video?
-The AI art generator used in the video is called NightCaff.
What was the first description the speaker used in the AI art generator?
-The first description used was for a parasaurolophus made of watermelon.
What style options were available in the AI art generator?
-The style options included regular NightCaff style, artistic portrait, modern comic, and others.
How did the AI art generator perform in creating the requested furry art?
-The AI art generator produced mixed results, often deviating from the original descriptions and sometimes creating bizarre or unrelated images.
What was the speaker's overall impression of the AI art generator?
-The speaker was not impressed with the AI art generator's ability to create coherent and accurate furry art commissions, finding the results to be mostly nonsensical or mismatched to the descriptions provided.
What advice does the speaker give to those seeking furry art?
-The speaker advises people to commission art from real artists, supporting their work and ensuring they get the desired outcome rather than relying on AI-generated art.
What was the speaker's final verdict on AI-generated art in the furry community?
-The speaker concluded that AI-generated art is not likely to replace real artists anytime soon, as it currently fails to produce stable and satisfactory commissions.
Outlines
🎨 AI Art Experiment Introduction
The speaker introduces the topic of AI-generated art, acknowledging the controversy surrounding it as a form of art theft. They explain their plan to use an AI art generator with descriptions of fursonas provided by Twitter users, aiming to see the results firsthand. The speaker is using a website called NightCaff to generate the art and plans to share the outcomes with the audience.
🖌️ AI Art Generation Process
The speaker details the process of generating AI art, starting with the description of a parasaurolophus made of watermelon. They discuss the various style options available on the AI platform, such as CGI character and modern comic, and share their decision-making process for selecting styles. The results range from incomplete images to bizarre combinations, highlighting the limitations and unexpected outcomes of AI-generated art.
🎮 Gaming and Anime Styles in AI Art
The speaker explores the use of gaming and anime styles in AI art generation, using descriptions of a white and tan coyote gaming and a red fluffy box doing donuts. They discuss the challenges of incorporating gaming elements and the stylization of the AI-generated images. The results include a Neo-impressionist painting-like image and an anime-style GT86 car in a stylized Tesco car park.
🐾 Animal and Fantasy Creatures in AI Art
The speaker continues the AI art experiment with prompts featuring animals and fantasy creatures, such as a knitting cat, a turtle, and an Irish cat dragon. They discuss the selection of styles like pop art and dark fantasy to match the descriptions. The AI-generated images showcase a mix of abstract and surreal results, with some capturing elements of the descriptions and others deviating significantly.
🔥 Pyromaniac Wolves and Blue Dragons in AI Art
In this section, the speaker focuses on more complex and dynamic prompts, such as a pyromaniac wolf playing with knives and a blue dragon that shoots blue fire. They experiment with styles like modern comic and epic to capture the essence of the descriptions. The AI-generated images range from a multi-winged, limbless blue dragon to a wolf with a fifth limb turning into a knife, highlighting the unpredictable nature of AI art.
🎭 Conclusion of AI Art Experiment
The speaker concludes the AI art experiment by summarizing the outcomes and expressing their thoughts on the potential of AI-generated art. They emphasize that while AI art can produce wild and entertaining results, it is not yet capable of replacing human artists. The speaker encourages viewers to support real artists and share their own AI-generated art experiences on their Discord server.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Generated Art
💡Furry Art
💡Art Theft
💡NightCaff
💡Parasaurolophus
💡Fursona
💡Art Commissions
💡CGI Character
💡Modern Comic
Highlights
AI generated art is a controversial topic within the furry community, as it is often viewed as art theft.
The creator decided to experiment with AI art by using descriptions of fursonas from Twitter users, without their knowledge of the purpose.
The AI art generator used in the experiment is called NightCaff, which offers various style options for the art.
The first prompt was a parasaurolophus made of watermelon, which resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate representation.
The AI struggled to generate Animal Crossing jokes for a brown wolf with a blue bone, resulting in a bizarre and unrelated image.
The experiment showed that AI art generation is not yet capable of replacing traditional artists, as the results were often nonsensical or mismatched to the prompts.
A request for a great white and tan coyote gaming led to a stylized, impressionist-style image without any gaming elements.
The AI's attempt at creating a red fluffy fox doing donuts in a Tesco car park resulted in a stylized car instead of a fox.
A knitting cat description led to a pop art-style image of a cat with leaves on its whiskers,偏离了原始描述.
The turtle prompt resulted in a photo-like image, which the AI generator failed to transform into anything beyond a basic turtle.
The Irish cat dragon description led to an image of an angry cat with dragon teeth, but without any clear Irish influence.
The Swedish dog description resulted in an abstract, colorful image that did not resemble the original request.
A gray cat with a bomb prompt led to a bizarre image of a cat on fire with an unclear number of legs.
The blue dragon that shoots blue fire description resulted in a strange, multi-winged creature that was not accurately represented.
The AI generator mixed up elements of the prompt, such as misinterpreting 'cheese wedge' as 'circle', leading to odd results.
The experiment concluded that AI art generation is still far from being able to produce stable and accurate art commissions.
The creator encourages viewers to support real artists and use AI art generators for entertainment rather than serious commissions.
The video ends with a call to action for viewers to share their own AI-generated art in a dedicated channel on the creator's Discord server.